Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Typesense VS Spark Streaming

Compare Typesense VS Spark Streaming and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Typesense logo Typesense

Typo tolerant, delightfully simple, open source search 🔍

Spark Streaming logo Spark Streaming

Spark Streaming makes it easy to build scalable and fault-tolerant streaming applications.
  • Typesense Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-07
  • Spark Streaming Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-10

Typesense features and specs

  • High Performance
    Typesense offers highly optimized search capabilities with fast response times, ensuring quick retrieval of search results even with large datasets.
  • Easy to Set Up
    Typesense is user-friendly and can be quickly set up using a simple configuration, making it accessible for developers who need a straightforward search solution.
  • Real-Time Indexing
    Typesense supports real-time indexing, meaning new data or updates to existing data are searchable almost immediately without significant delay.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source solution, Typesense provides transparency, community support, and the possibility for customization to meet specific needs.
  • Typo Tolerance
    Typesense’s built-in typo tolerance allows for forgiving spell-check and correction, enhancing user experience by returning relevant results despite minor typing errors.
  • Faceted Search
    The platform supports faceted search, which lets users narrow down search results through various categories, improving relevancy and user navigation.

Possible disadvantages of Typesense

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some competitors, Typesense offers fewer advanced search features like natural language processing or machine learning-based relevance tuning.
  • Community Support
    Being relatively newer, Typesense has a smaller user base and community support compared to established search engines like ElasticSearch or Solr.
  • Documentation
    Some users may find Typesense’s documentation to be less comprehensive, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve for complex use-cases.
  • Scalability
    While Typesense is scalable, enterprise-level users managing extremely large datasets might find it less robust compared to established solutions that have been battle-tested in large-scale environments.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    The integration ecosystem is still developing, which means fewer out-of-the-box integrations with other popular tools and platforms compared to older search engines.

Spark Streaming features and specs

  • Scalability
    Spark Streaming is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of data by distributing the workload across a cluster of machines. It leverages Apache Spark's capabilities to scale out easily and efficiently.
  • Integration
    It integrates seamlessly with other components of the Spark ecosystem, such as Spark SQL, MLlib, and GraphX, allowing for comprehensive data processing pipelines.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Spark Streaming provides fault tolerance by using Spark's micro-batching approach, which allows the system to recover data in case of a failure.
  • Ease of Use
    Spark Streaming provides high-level APIs in Java, Scala, and Python, making it relatively easy to develop and deploy streaming applications quickly.
  • Unified Platform
    It provides a unified platform for both batch and streaming data processing, allowing reuse of code and resources across different types of workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Spark Streaming

  • Latency
    Spark Streaming operates on a micro-batch processing model, which introduces latency compared to real-time processing. This may not be suitable for applications requiring immediate responses.
  • Complexity
    While it integrates well with other Spark components, building complex streaming applications can still be challenging and may require expertise in distributed systems and stream processing concepts.
  • Resource Management
    Efficiently managing cluster resources and tuning the system can be difficult, especially when dealing with variable workload and ensuring optimal performance.
  • Backpressure Handling
    Handling backpressure effectively can be a challenge in Spark Streaming, requiring careful management to prevent resource saturation or data loss.
  • Limited Windowing Support
    Compared to some stream processing frameworks, Spark Streaming has more limited options for complex windowing operations, which can restrict some advanced use cases.

Analysis of Typesense

Overall verdict

  • Typesense is generally considered to be a good search engine solution, particularly for small to medium-scale applications where ease of use and performance are key considerations. It offers an excellent balance between functionality, customization, and ease of setup. However, for very large-scale applications, or if you need advanced features beyond what Typesense offers, it might be worth comparing with enterprise-level solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Typesense is an open-source search engine that's known for its speed, simplicity, and developer-friendly features. It is designed to be easy to deploy and integrate with applications, making it a great choice for projects that need a fast and efficient search solution. Typesense offers typo-tolerance, custom ranking, faceting, and real-time updates which are essential for delivering a seamless search experience. Additionally, it provides a well-documented API and modern client libraries which facilitate smooth development processes.

Recommended for

    Developers and teams looking for a lightweight, fast, and developer-friendly search engine for their web or mobile applications. Typesense is particularly suitable for projects that require real-time search, typo-tolerance, and a straightforward integration process.

Typesense videos

+ Add

Getting started with Typesense

Spark Streaming videos

+ Add

Spark Streaming Vs Kafka Streams || Which is The Best for Stream Processing?

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Spark Streaming Vs Structured Streaming Comparison | Big Data Hadoop Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Typesense and Spark Streaming)

Typesense

Spark Streaming

Custom Search Engine
100 100%
Custom Search Engine
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100
Custom Search
100 100%
Custom Search
0% 0
Data Management
0 0%
Data Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Typesense and Spark Streaming. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Typesense and Spark Streaming

Typesense Reviews

Best Elasticsearch alternatives for search
A plug for yours truly! At Relevance AI, we’re building an Elasticsearch alternative that is very different to alternatives like Algolia and Typesense. Relevance AI search is an instant search API that understands “semantics”.
Source: relevance.ai
5 Open-Source Search Engines For your Website
Typesense is a fast, typo-tolerant search engine for building delightful search experiences. It claims that it is an Easier-to-Use ElasticSearch Alternative & an Open Source Algolia Alternative.
Source: vishnuch.tech
Recommendations for Poor Man's ElasticSearch on AWS?
Oh hey! I'm one of the co-founders of Typesense. Delighted to stumble on a mention of Typesense on Indiehackers. Long time lurker, first time poster :)
Source: www.indiehackers.com

Spark Streaming Reviews

We have no reviews of Spark Streaming yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Typesense seems to be a lot more popular than Spark Streaming. While we know about 58 links to Typesense, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Spark Streaming. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Typesense mentions (58)

View more

Spark Streaming mentions (5)

  • RisingWave Turns Four: Our Journey Beyond Democratizing Stream Processing
    The last decade saw the rise of open-source frameworks like Apache Flink, Spark Streaming, and Apache Samza. These offered more flexibility but still demanded significant engineering muscle to run effectively at scale. Companies using them often needed specialized stream processing engineers just to manage internal state, tune performance, and handle the day-to-day operational challenges. The barrier to entry... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Streaming Data Alchemy: Apache Kafka Streams Meet Spring Boot
    Apache Spark Streaming: Offers micro-batch processing, suitable for high-throughput scenarios that can tolerate slightly higher latency. https://spark.apache.org/streaming/. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Machine Learning Pipelines with Spark: Introductory Guide (Part 1)
    Spark Streaming: The component for real-time data processing and analytics. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Spark for beginners - and you
    Is a big data framework and currently one of the most popular tools for big data analytics. It contains libraries for data analysis, machine learning, graph analysis and streaming live data. In general Spark is faster than Hadoop, as it does not write intermediate results to disk. It is not a data storage system. We can use Spark on top of HDFS or read data from other sources like Amazon S3. It is the designed... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Typesense and Spark Streaming, you can also consider the following products

Algolia - Algolia's Search API makes it easy to deliver a great search experience in your apps & websites. Algolia Search provides hosted full-text, numerical, faceted and geolocalized search.

Confluent - Confluent offers a real-time data platform built around Apache Kafka.

Meilisearch - Ultra relevant, instant, and typo-tolerant full-text search API

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

ElasticSearch - Elasticsearch is an open source, distributed, RESTful search engine.

Google Cloud Dataflow - Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.

Loading...