Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Tux Commander VS Raysync

Compare Tux Commander VS Raysync and see what are their differences

Tux Commander logo Tux Commander

Tux Commander Homepage, an opensource GTK2 file manager

Raysync logo Raysync

Professional high-speed file transmission system, quickly distribute TB-class mass files worldwide.
  • Tux Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-28
  • Raysync Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-26

Tux Commander features and specs

  • Open Source
    Tux Commander is free to use and modify, allowing users access to its source code, which promotes transparency and community-driven improvements.
  • Dual Panel Interface
    It features a dual-panel interface that enhances file management efficiency by allowing users to view and manage files from two folders simultaneously.
  • Plugin Support
    Its architecture supports plugins which extend its functionality, making it adaptable to different user needs.
  • Lightweight
    Tux Commander is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on less powerful hardware.
  • Familiar GUI
    The graphical user interface is intuitive and similar to other file managers, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Tux Commander

  • Limited Development
    The software has seen slower development progress in recent years, which may lead to issues with compatibility with newer systems or lack of new features.
  • Linux Exclusive
    Tux Commander is designed specifically for Linux, limiting its availability and usefulness on other operating systems like Windows or macOS.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to some modern file managers, it lacks advanced features such as integrated cloud storage support and advanced search functionalities.
  • Potentially Outdated Interface
    Its user interface may feel dated compared to more modern file management solutions, which could affect user experience.

Raysync features and specs

  • High-Speed Transfer
    Raysync offers high-speed file transfer solutions, which greatly reduce transfer time compared to traditional methods, especially for large files or over long distances.
  • Security
    It provides robust security features such as AES-256 encryption, SSL, and other security protocols that ensure data safety during transit.
  • Scalability
    Raysync can handle a broad range of transfer needs, from small businesses to large enterprises, providing scalability as businesses grow.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, reducing the learning curve and making it accessible even to those with minimal technical expertise.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Raysync supports integration with a variety of enterprise platforms and workflows, allowing seamless data handling and processing.

Possible disadvantages of Raysync

  • Cost
    The pricing model may be considered expensive for small businesses or individual users compared to other file transfer solutions.
  • Internet Dependency
    Since Raysync is an online tool, its performance is dependent on the quality and speed of the user's internet connection, which can vary greatly.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and configurations can be complex and may require technical expertise.
  • Resource Intensive
    Raysync may require significant system resources, which can be a downside for systems with limited capacity or older hardware.

Tux Commander videos

No Tux Commander videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Raysync videos

Raysync - High-speed File Transfer Solution

More videos:

  • Review - Raysync User Guide - Transfer List
  • Review - Raysync User Guide - Notification Center

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tux Commander and Raysync)
FTP Client
24 24%
76% 76
File Manager
24 24%
76% 76
File Management
14 14%
86% 86
File Explorer
55 55%
45% 45

User comments

Share your experience with using Tux Commander and Raysync. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Raysync might be a bit more popular than Tux Commander. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Tux Commander. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tux Commander mentions (1)

  • One Commander – a new Windows 10 file browser
    If you want OSS alternatives for Linux, here are some. A few may look old and unpolished, but today pretty much every desktop environment comes with its own file manager. https://www.4pane.co.uk/ https://doublecmd.sourceforge.io/ https://ignorantguru.github.io/spacefm/ http://tuxcmd.sourceforge.net/ http://www.boomerangsworld.de/cms/worker/ http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Raysync mentions (1)

  • The inevitable "Why are my transfers so slow" and how to fix it
    We are planning to install direct 1GB MPLS links between the sites (I know, latency) - so what are some more tricks I can try? Should I just purchase hardware network acceleration devices? The other thought was using a service like raysync.io. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tux Commander and Raysync, you can also consider the following products

FTP Synchronizer - Secure and high performance FTP File Sync product

GNOME Commander - GNOME Commander is a "two-pane" graphical file manager for the GNOME desktop environment.

Polo File Manager - Software for Linux

Rodent - Rodent is a project file manager for browsers; it helps you organize your work without saving files locally.

CLEX - CLEX is a command-line interface-based file manager for managing and editing project files, no matter where they are stored.

xfdesktop - The xfdesktop application manages the desktop backdrop.