We map the TUS[0] protocol to S3 multipart upload operations. This lets us obscure the S3 bucket from the client. The TUS operations are handled by a dedicated micro-service. It could be done in a Lambda or anything. Once the upload completes we kick off a workflow to virus scan, unzip, decrypt, and process the file depending on what it is. For virus scanning, we started with ClamAV[1], but eventually bought a... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Resumable uploads are powered by the TUS protocol. The journey to get here was immensely rewarding, working closely with the TUS team. A big shoutout to the maintainers of the TUS protocol, @murderlon and @acconut, for their collaborative approach to open source. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

If it’s one way (that wasn’t quite clear from the requirements to me). Take a look at https://tus.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

HTTP/1 requests (uploads in this case) are also separate to some degree (though there are fairly stringent limits on connections per domain iirc which HTTP/2 resolves via the mentioned streams/multiplexing of connections). The problem they have specifically would be that in a single request (form post for example) those uploads will be linear. Solution really boils down to paralellizing the upload, using... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Hey hn, supabase ceo here This release introduces a few new features to Supabase Storage: Resumable Uploads , Quality Filters, Next.js support, and WebP support. As a reminder, Supabase Storage is for file storage, not to be confused with Postgres Storage. Resumable Uploads is the biggest update because it means that you can build more resilient apps: your users can continue uploading a file if their internet... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Do you think that Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is good for digital preservation of my ~300GB video stash? Source: 11 months ago

Easy - I know about S3 Glaciers but I'd prefer something that doesn't require going through a number of tutorials to use. Source: about 1 year ago

The nice thing about AWS is that you could use Amazon S3 Glacier storage if you can live with slower retrieval (5-12 hours). It's really cheap and excellent for non-changing requirements which would be good for media that isn't updating regularly. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: about 1 year ago

I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. Source: over 1 year ago

What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. Source: over 1 year ago