No tus.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, tus.io should be more popular than Amazon Elastic Transcoder. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
We map the TUS[0] protocol to S3 multipart upload operations. This lets us obscure the S3 bucket from the client. The TUS operations are handled by a dedicated micro-service. It could be done in a Lambda or anything. Once the upload completes we kick off a workflow to virus scan, unzip, decrypt, and process the file depending on what it is. For virus scanning, we started with ClamAV[1], but eventually bought a... - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago
Resumable uploads are powered by the TUS protocol. The journey to get here was immensely rewarding, working closely with the TUS team. A big shoutout to the maintainers of the TUS protocol, @murderlon and @acconut, for their collaborative approach to open source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
If it’s one way (that wasn’t quite clear from the requirements to me). Take a look at https://tus.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
HTTP/1 requests (uploads in this case) are also separate to some degree (though there are fairly stringent limits on connections per domain iirc which HTTP/2 resolves via the mentioned streams/multiplexing of connections). The problem they have specifically would be that in a single request (form post for example) those uploads will be linear. Solution really boils down to paralellizing the upload, using... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Hey hn, supabase ceo here This release introduces a few new features to Supabase Storage: Resumable Uploads , Quality Filters, Next.js support, and WebP support. As a reminder, Supabase Storage is for file storage, not to be confused with Postgres Storage. Resumable Uploads is the biggest update because it means that you can build more resilient apps: your users can continue uploading a file if their internet... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Alternatively, if your Internet connection can handle it, you could upload your videos to a cloud service that processes them for you. For example, Amazon's AWS has a transcoding service called Elastic, which charges 3 cents per minute of video (half of that if it's lower than 720p). Might be worth the reduced time and effort for business use. Source: 12 months ago
If you're looking for an AWS specific solution, check out Amazon Elastic Transcoder. I think it'll do what you want with a pipeline and you can do it serverless. Source: over 1 year ago
If you use https://aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/ then you don’t need a computer, it’s a managed service, get your files to s3 somehow and thats it. There are some other services from other providers that can do the same too, I strongly encourage to look into that, unless you have specific encoding specs that you can’t do somewhere. Source: about 2 years ago
However compressing on the server is the better option in case you want to generate gifs, thumbnails, and different sizes and formats of the video. A lot of big video streaming companies will use something like Amazons media convert. Source: over 2 years ago
This is how I'd do it, but instead of using EC2 for step 5 I'd look into Elastic Transcoder. Source: over 2 years ago
Uppy - The next open source file uploader for web browsers
Coconut - Coconut is a cloud video encoding solution, built for developers.
CarrierWave - Solution for file uploads for Rails, Sinatra and other Ruby web frameworks.
Zencoder - Audio and video encoding/transcoding software as a service.
Paperclip - A faster way to user interfaces for React applications
HandBrake - HandBrake allows users to easily convert video files into a wide variety of different formats.