Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Amazon Elastic Transcoder VS Coconut

Compare Amazon Elastic Transcoder VS Coconut and see what are their differences

Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Amazon Elastic Transcoder is media transcoding in the cloud.

Coconut logo Coconut

Coconut is a cloud video encoding solution, built for developers.
  • Amazon Elastic Transcoder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02
  • Coconut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

Amazon Elastic Transcoder features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon Elastic Transcoder automatically scales to handle the volume of media files you need to process, accommodating fluctuating workloads without manual intervention.
  • Integration with AWS
    As an AWS service, Elastic Transcoder integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3 for storage and CloudFront for distribution, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • Predefined Presets
    It offers a range of predefined presets that simplify the process of transcoding media into the desired formats for different devices and resolutions.
  • Pay-as-you-go Pricing
    Elastic Transcoder employs a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to only pay for what they use without upfront commitments.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon Elastic Transcoder

  • Complex Initial Setup
    Setting up Elastic Transcoder can be complex for users unfamiliar with AWS services, requiring an understanding of IAM roles, buckets, and other AWS concepts.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although it offers a pay-as-you-go model, understanding the pricing structure in detail can be complicated, particularly when estimating costs for large-scale operations.
  • Performance Limitations
    For very high volume or extremely demanding media processing tasks, Elastic Transcoder might not offer the speed or customization that specialized solutions or on-premises systems can provide.
  • Limited Customization
    While Elastic Transcoder supports presets for convenience, there might be limited customization options compared to using dedicated, on-premise media processing software.

Coconut features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Coconut offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that is especially beneficial for users who are not technically adept. This makes managing financial tasks simpler for freelancers and small business owners.
  • All-in-One Solution
    It combines banking and accounting features into one platform, which helps users streamline their financial management by having everything in one place, reducing the need for multiple tools.
  • Expense Tracking and Invoicing
    Coconut provides efficient tools for tracking expenses and generating invoices, making it easier for freelancers and small businesses to manage their finances and get paid on time.
  • Tax Assistance
    The platform offers features that help users with tax calculations and submissions, which can reduce the stress and complexity associated with self-assessment.
  • Real-Time Notifications
    Users receive real-time notifications for transactions, helping them stay up-to-date with their account activities and better manage cash flow.

Possible disadvantages of Coconut

  • Limited Features Compared to Traditional Banks
    While Coconut provides several banking functionalities, it may not offer the full range of services provided by traditional banks, such as loans or extensive credit services.
  • UK-Centric
    Coconut primarily caters to customers in the UK, which may limit its usefulness for users outside this region or those who require international banking solutions.
  • Monthly Fees
    While Coconut offers valuable features, some of these come with a monthly fee. This can be a downside for users looking for free financial management solutions.
  • Limited Integration Options
    Compared to other financial tools, Coconut might have fewer integration options with third-party applications, which can be a drawback for users who rely on diverse software ecosystems.
  • No Physical Branches
    Being an entirely digital platform, Coconut does not provide access to physical branches, which might be a disadvantage for users who prefer in-person banking services.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder videos

AWS Tutorial 38 - Amazon Elastic Transcoder

More videos:

  • Review - AWS Webcast - What's New with Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Coconut videos

Everything You Need To Know About Coconuts - Coconut Milk, Oil, Sugar, Water, & More!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Coconut)
Video Converter
72 72%
28% 28
Video
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Video Platform
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Coconut. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon Elastic Transcoder should be more popular than Coconut. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder mentions (7)

  • AV1 tool to auto compress old video files for archive
    Alternatively, if your Internet connection can handle it, you could upload your videos to a cloud service that processes them for you. For example, Amazon's AWS has a transcoding service called Elastic, which charges 3 cents per minute of video (half of that if it's lower than 720p). Might be worth the reduced time and effort for business use. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Converting Video Audio To A File Using AWS?
    If you're looking for an AWS specific solution, check out Amazon Elastic Transcoder. I think it'll do what you want with a pipeline and you can do it serverless. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Cloud computing noob question(s)!
    If you use https://aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/ then you don’t need a computer, it’s a managed service, get your files to s3 somehow and thats it. There are some other services from other providers that can do the same too, I strongly encourage to look into that, unless you have specific encoding specs that you can’t do somewhere. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Where should i compress the video
    However compressing on the server is the better option in case you want to generate gifs, thumbnails, and different sizes and formats of the video. A lot of big video streaming companies will use something like Amazons media convert. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Scaling node.js backend service (Help to choose perfect design pattern and tools)
    This is how I'd do it, but instead of using EC2 for step 5 I'd look into Elastic Transcoder. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Coconut mentions (1)

  • cam Plus lite does not support the newer cameras FYI... cameras like the new pan v3
    I did the math, just to transcode 24/7 footage down to smaller files with coconut.co on one camera would be $648, with AWS elastic transcoding, that would be nearly double. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Coconut, you can also consider the following products

Rendi - Rendi is a simple REST API for FFmpeg. We take care the cloud infrastructure and costs, so you don't have to.

AWS Elemental Server - AWS Elemental Server provides fast and reliable video processing for file-based workflows.

AWS Elemental MediaConvert - AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a file-based video processing service that allows video providers to transcode content for broadcast and multiscreen delivery at scale.

Wistia - Host, manage, and track your videos with the best video marketing tools in the (known) universe.

Cloudinary - Cloudinary is a cloud-based service for hosting videos and images designed specifically with the needs of web and mobile developers in mind.

Telestream - Telestream offers video capture, encoding, transcoding, and network-based delivery.