Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

tunnelto.dev VS Next.js

Compare tunnelto.dev VS Next.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

tunnelto.dev logo tunnelto.dev

Expose localhost to the internet with a public URL

Next.js logo Next.js

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
  • tunnelto.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Next.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-19

tunnelto.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Tunnelto.dev is designed for simplicity, allowing users to easily expose their local services to the internet without complex setup procedures.
  • No Signup Required
    Users can start using tunnelto.dev without the need to register for an account, which reduces friction and speeds up the testing process.
  • Developer Focused
    The service is built with developers in mind, offering features that cater to development and testing workflows.
  • Custom Subdomains
    Tunnelto.dev allows users to choose custom subdomains, making it easier to manage and remember addresses for different services.
  • Security
    Provides secure tunnels to local services using TLS encryption, which helps protect data transmitted over the internet.

Possible disadvantages of tunnelto.dev

  • Limited Free Tier
    The free version of tunnelto.dev has restrictions, which might not be sufficient for extended usage or more complex applications.
  • Bandwidth and Performance Constraints
    Like many tunneling services, there might be bandwidth and performance limitations, particularly for high-traffic applications.
  • Dependency on External Service
    By relying on tunnelto.dev, users become dependent on an external service for accessing local applications remotely, which can be a point of failure.
  • Potential Latency
    Tunnels might introduce additional latency, which can affect the responsiveness of applications, especially in regions far from the service's servers.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Even though data is encrypted, using third-party tunneling involves sending data through external servers, which may raise privacy concerns for some users.

Next.js features and specs

  • Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
    Next.js supports SSR, allowing pages to be rendered on the server-side before being sent to the client. This results in improved SEO and faster initial page loads.
  • Static Site Generation (SSG)
    Enables pre-rendering pages at build time, which can further improve performance and scalability while allowing for dynamic generation when needed.
  • API Routes
    Next.js allows you to build API endpoints directly in the application, simplifying the process of creating back-end services and endpoints.
  • File-Based Routing
    Offers a simple file-based routing mechanism where the file structure maps directly to the app’s routes, making it easier to manage and understand.
  • Automatic Code Splitting
    Automatically splits code at the page level, reducing the initial load time and improving performance by only loading necessary JavaScript.
  • TypeScript Support
    Built-in support for TypeScript, allowing developers to use static type checking and other TypeScript features easily.
  • Developer Experience
    Provides a great developer experience with features like fast refresh, hot reloading, and detailed error reporting.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Benefiting from the rich ecosystem of the React community and integrating well with other libraries and tools.
  • Internationalization
    Built-in support for internationalization helps developers build multilingual applications with ease.
  • Community and Support
    Strong community and extensive documentation provide ample support and resources for new and experienced developers alike.

Possible disadvantages of Next.js

  • Learning Curve
    The robust feature set of Next.js can present a steep learning curve for developers who are new to React or server-side rendering concepts.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Although Next.js aims for simplicity, complex projects may still require significant configuration and customization.
  • Performance Overhead
    SSR can introduce additional server load and latency compared to static site generators, especially under high traffic conditions.
  • Deployment Complexity
    Deploying Next.js applications that leverage SSR or API routes may be more complex and could require more sophisticated server infrastructure.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    If heavily relying on Next.js-specific features, moving away from the framework to another solution could require significant refactoring.
  • Bundle Size
    Without careful optimization, client-side bundle sizes can become large, negatively affecting the application’s performance.
  • Build Times
    For large applications, build times can be significant, impacting the development cycle and deployment times.
  • Dependencies
    Next.js introduces its own set of dependencies and tooling, which might complicate version management and compatibility with other tools.

tunnelto.dev videos

No tunnelto.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Next.js videos

Next.js: The React Framework - JS Monthly - July 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Gatsby vs Next.js: Which does SSG Better?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to tunnelto.dev and Next.js)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using tunnelto.dev and Next.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare tunnelto.dev and Next.js

tunnelto.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of tunnelto.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Next.js Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
Next.js is a well-known platform most of you utilize to build a responsive website. However, if you are annoyed by its limited features, consider Next.js alternatives because flexibility and faster loading speed are always the top concerns of every developer. For this reason, you might need to read this article to explore the top 10 Nextjs Alternatives for the exciting world...
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
When it comes to building modern web applications, finding the right framework can be a game-changer. Next.js is often a top choice, but there are several Next.js alternatives worth considering.
10 Best Next.js Alternatives to Consider Today
For those who have been accustomed to the benefits of React Next.js, keeping an eye on the latest version is crucial. Next.js's continuous improvement and updates in Next.js enhance its capabilities, ensuring developers can access cutting-edge features and optimizations. Whether starting a new project or maintaining an existing Next.js website, staying informed about the...
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Next.js uses JavaScript and React components to create the UI. Next.js is influenced by React Router, Webpack, Node ecosystem, and community libraries. The feature that sets Next.js apart from other frameworks is its ability to automatically generate pages based on the file system structure of the project. For example, if there is a _posts folder in the root directory,...
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Some of its top features include server-side rendering, automatic code splitting, client-side routing, built-in CSS support, static site generation and API routes. Overall, Next.JS is a powerful and flexible framework that provides developers with a simple and intuitive way to build complex React applications with ease. It is widely used in the React community and has a...
Source: www.bocasay.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Next.js seems to be a lot more popular than tunnelto.dev. While we know about 1071 links to Next.js, we've tracked only 4 mentions of tunnelto.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

tunnelto.dev mentions (4)

  • Best 5 ngrok alternatives in 2023
    Https://tunnelto.dev is my preference as it’s very reasonably priced. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to forward ports via VPS & VPN
    So in the end, for those interested with the same issue (How to forward ports behind the Starlink CGNAT), all the VPN providers I tried were bad (the IP they allow to open weren't working well, or they only provide dynamic IPs), so in the end I : 1/ bought a small router on Amazon, the GL-MT1300 (by GL-iNet) but their smaller routers should work too:... Source: over 2 years ago
  • SSH into your private machines from anywhere, for free, using Cloudflare Tunnel
    This sounds a lot like https://tunnelto.dev/, which I've used and generally like. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know what, if any, the differences are, though. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • I've rewritten (and redesign?) frp in Rust, and seen a large improvement in performance and memory
    FWIW there is already a similar program (reverse proxy / nat traverser) in Rust: tunnelto. They don't provide bench infos though. Source: over 3 years ago

Next.js mentions (1071)

  • Angular: Beyond the fog #1
    My only true recommendation would be to prefer React for mobile or SSR applications, as community projects (Expo for mobile and Next.js for SSR) are more mature and easier to set up. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Generate Git action CI/CD pipeline using Amazon Q CLI
    This is a Next.js project bootstrapped with create-next-app. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Build an Inventory Management System Using MongoDB Atlas
    We will walk you through the process of configuring and using MongoDB Atlas as your back end for your Next.js app, a powerful framework for building modern web applications with React. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • What I learned building my first AI Agent – Part 1
    After refining the user interface and doing some tests, I had a minimal functional AI agent capable of answering questions about Figma features . Since I was using Next.js, I decided to host my app on Vercel, since it was the platform that provided me the easiest and most intuitive way to do it. I was very happy with the result, even though the application was simple, in just a few days I managed to learn about... - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • We Fell Out of Love with Next.js and Back in Love with Ruby on Rails
    3. Load personalized data (json) But usually step 1 and 2 are served from a cdn, so very fast. On subsequent requests, 1 and 2 are usually served from the browser cache, so extremely fast. SSR is usually not faster. Most often slower. You can check yourself in your browser dev tools (network tab): https://www.solidjs.com/ vs. https://nextjs.org/ So much complexity and effort in the nextjs app, but so much slower. - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing tunnelto.dev and Next.js, you can also consider the following products

Expose - A beautiful, open-source, tunneling service - written in PHP

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

cotunnel - Remote access and tunnels to your local device.

Nuxt.js - Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. It's a perfect static site generator.