Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Traefik VS devd

Compare Traefik VS devd and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
The page you are looking for does not exist
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Traefik logo Traefik

Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

devd logo devd

A local web server for developers
  • Traefik Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-13
  • devd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

Traefik features and specs

  • Dynamic Configuration
    Traefik allows for dynamic configuration changes without needing restarts, making it easy to manage in rapidly evolving environments.
  • Kubernetes Integration
    Traefik has native support for Kubernetes, simplifying the process of managing ingress controllers and load balancing in containerized environments.
  • Service Discovery
    It supports automatic service discovery via various backends, including Docker, Consul, and Kubernetes, making it easy to integrate into many architectures.
  • HTTPS Support
    Traefik can automatically obtain and renew SSL/TLS certificates using Let's Encrypt, ensuring secure communications.
  • Middleware
    It supports middleware for handling tasks such as authentication, rate limiting, and retries, offering more control over traffic management.
  • Dashboard
    Traefik includes a built-in dashboard for monitoring and visualizing the routing configuration and health of services.

Possible disadvantages of Traefik

  • Complexity
    The flexibility and range of features can make Traefik complex to configure and understand for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional abstraction layer can introduce some performance overhead, which might be a concern in high-performance environments.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Although Traefik covers many standard use cases, it may lack some advanced features that are found in more specialized load balancers.
  • Documentation
    While improving, the documentation can sometimes be lacking in depth or clarity, which can lead to difficulties in configuration and troubleshooting.
  • Community Support
    Although there is an active community, it may not be as vast or responsive as that of some other more established software like NGINX or HAProxy.
  • Proprietary Features
    Some advanced features are only available in the enterprise edition, which might be a constraint for users looking for a completely open-source solution.

devd features and specs

  • Live Reload
    devd automatically refreshes the browser when a file change is detected, which improves development workflow efficiency by reducing manual reloads.
  • Simple Setup
    Installing and running devd requires minimal setup, making it accessible and easy to use for developers looking for quick local server setup.
  • HTTPS Support
    devd supports HTTPS out of the box, allowing developers to test their applications in a secure environment without extra configuration.
  • Proxying Capabilities
    devd can act as a reverse proxy, enabling complex setups where requests can be routed to different backends, suitable for microservices architectures.
  • Cross-platform
    As a Go application, devd can run on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it highly versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of devd

  • Limited Advanced Features
    devd focuses on simplicity, which might lead to a lack of advanced server features found in more robust solutions like live data manipulation.
  • Niche User Base
    As devd is not as widely used as other local servers, community support and resources may be less abundant compared to more popular alternatives.
  • Lack of Built-in Authentication
    devd does not have built-in authentication mechanisms, which might necessitate additional setup or external solutions for development environments requiring user authentication.
  • Single-Purpose Tool
    devd is mainly a static file server with some live reload and proxy capabilities, which may not be sufficient for more complex web application setups requiring server-side logic.

Analysis of Traefik

Overall verdict

  • Traefik is a solid choice for managing and routing microservices traffic. Its lightweight design and broad feature set cater well to containerized and cloud-native environments. However, the final suitability of Traefik depends on specific project needs and architectural requirements, and organizations should evaluate it against their use cases.

Why this product is good

  • Traefik is considered good due to its flexibility, ease of use, and vibrant community. As a modern reverse proxy and load balancer, it is highly compatible with microservices and cloud-native environments. It supports various backends through dynamic configurations, provides seamless integration with Docker and Kubernetes, and offers automated SSL certificate management via Let's Encrypt. Traefik's extensive metrics and dashboarding capabilities also make it a favorable choice for monitoring traffic and performance metrics.

Recommended for

  • Microservices architectures
  • Containerized environments using Docker or Kubernetes
  • Cloud-native applications
  • Projects requiring dynamic and auto-updating configurations
  • Developers in need of automated SSL certificate management

Traefik videos

+ Add

Traefik: A Scalable and Highly Available Edge Router by Damien Duportalt

More videos:

  • Review - Playing around with Traefik
  • Review - Rocket.Chat on Amazon EKS with Traefik. By Aaron Ogle, Lead Cloud Architect

devd videos

No devd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Traefik and devd)

Traefik

devd

Web Servers
92 92%
Web Servers
8% 8
Web And Application Servers
92 92%
Web And Application Servers
8% 8
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
100 100%
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
Application Server
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Traefik and devd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Traefik and devd

Traefik Reviews

Top 5 Open Source Load Balancers in 2024
Traefik's prowess extends beyond the conventional, equipped with a robust set of middlewares that elevate its capabilities. Going beyond load balancing and reverse proxy roles, Traefik serves as a comprehensive solution for modern cloud-native applications, including API gateway, orchestrator ingress, east-west service communication, and more.
Source: www.techtimes.com
10 Awesome Open Source Load Balancers
Traefik is a reverse proxy and L7 load balancer. Written in Go, it’s designed to support microservices and container-powered services in a distributed system. It has native support for Docker Swarm and Kubernetes orchestration, as well as service registries such as etcd or Consul. It also offers extensive support for WebSocket, HTTP/2, and gRPC services. Traefik integrates...
Source: www.containiq.com
Top 5 Open-Source Load Balancers 2021
The modern and efficient, Traefik is an open-source reverse proxy and load balancer that provides a simple routing platform without engaging any complexities. Most popular among the Github Fanclub, Traefik owns approximately 27.7k Github stars.
Source: linuxways.net
The 5 Best Open Source Load Balancers
Traefik bills itself as the “cloud native edge router.” It’s a modern microservices-focused application load balancer and reverse proxy written in Golang. With its emphasis on support for several modern container orchestration platforms, batteries-included logging, and several popular metric formats, Traefik is a top choice for container-based microservices architectures.
Source: logz.io

devd Reviews

We have no reviews of devd yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Traefik should be more popular than devd. It has been mentiond 38 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Traefik mentions (38)

  • Adventures in Homelabbing: From Cloud Obsession to Self-Hosted Shenanigans
    I began to self-host a Minecraft server using Crafty Controller, an Excalidraw instance, Docmost to replace Notion, Plane to replace Jira, and Penpot to replace Figma. To be able to access them from the internet, I used Nginx Proxy Manager to set up reverse proxies with SSL. You can use Traefik or Caddy instead, but I enjoyed the ease-of-use of NPM. For a dashboard solution, I started with Homarr, but later... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Nginx vs Traefik: Which Reverse Proxy is Right for You?
    Before diving into the specifics of Nginx and Traefik, let’s quickly define what a reverse proxy is. A reverse proxy sits between the client (browser or other services) and your backend services (web servers or applications). It handles incoming requests, routes them to the appropriate backend service, and forwards the response to the client. Reverse proxies are typically used for:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Opening Pandora's Container - How Exposing the Docker Socket Paves the Way to Host Control (Part 1)
    You may wonder why one would even want to expose the Docker socket when there are clearly risks involved. A popular usecase besides accessing remote Docker daemons (which you can actually expose over a TCP socket) are applications that either need control of the daemon to manage other containers, like for example Portainer, or tools that need information about containers for auto discovery purposes, like Traefik.... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • The Home Server Journey - 3: An Actually Global "Hello"
    I emphasize usually because K3s is different and comes with a Traefik-based ingress controller by default. Taking that into account, as much as I like NGINX outside the container's world, I'd rather keep things simple and use what's already in place. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Running Docker based web applications in Hashicorp Nomad with Traefik Load balancing
    In previous post, we discussed creating a basic Nomad cluster in the Vultr cloud. Here, we will use the cluster created to deploy a load-balanced sample web app using the service discovery capability of Nomad and its native integration with the Traefik load balancer. The source code is available here for the reference. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

devd mentions (5)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Traefik and devd, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Haproxy - Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Nginx Proxy Manager - Docker container and built in Web Application for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface, providing free SSL support via Let's Encrypt

Loading...