Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Topaz.sh VS Warrant

Compare Topaz.sh VS Warrant and see what are their differences

Topaz.sh logo Topaz.sh

Cloud-native authorization. Combining the best of OPA and Zanzibar

Warrant logo Warrant

Authorization and access control infrastructure for developers
  • Topaz.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

Topaz is an open-source authorization service providing fine grained, real-time, policy based access control for applications and APIs.

It comes with built in support for every major programming language as well as every popular authorization model (RBAC, ABAC, PBAM, ReBAC, and combinations).

  • Warrant Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-05

Topaz.sh

Website
topaz.sh
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
free
Platforms
Azure AWS GCP Node JS Java JavaScript Ruby Python Go .Net
Release Date
2022 October

Topaz.sh features and specs

  • Graph directory: Yes
  • OPA decision engine: Yes
  • ReBAC: Yes
  • ABAC: Yes
  • RBAC: Yes

Warrant features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Topaz.sh videos

No Topaz.sh videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Warrant videos

Disc Review: Dynamic Discs Warrant

More videos:

  • Review - Dynamic Disc Warrant Review: Air It Out Disc Reviews Ep.24
  • Review - Dynamic Discs Warrant

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Topaz.sh and Warrant)
Developer Tool
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
5 5%
95% 95
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Topaz.sh and Warrant.

What makes your product unique?

Topaz.sh's answer

It is the only open-source authorization project to support every authorization model and combinations

How would you describe your primary audience?

Topaz.sh's answer

Applications developers charged with implementing access controls for their applications/APIs

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Topaz.sh's answer

Golang based and uses Open Policy Agent as the decision engine

User comments

Share your experience with using Topaz.sh and Warrant. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Warrant seems to be a lot more popular than Topaz.sh. While we know about 21 links to Warrant, we've tracked only 1 mention of Topaz.sh. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Topaz.sh mentions (1)

  • Authorization is still a nightmare for engineers
    Congrats on the launch! [Disclosure: I'm one of the co-founders of Aserto, the creators of Topaz]. The problem of data filtering is indeed a huge part of building an effective authorization system. Partial evaluation is one way of doing it, although with systems like OPA [0] it requires a lot of heavy lifting (parsing the returned AST and converting it into a WHERE clause). Looking forward to seeing how turnkey... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Warrant mentions (21)

  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Warrant — Hosted enterprise-grade authorization and access control service for your apps. The free tier includes 1 million monthly API requests and 1,000 authz rules. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How Open ID Connect Works
    The specific challenge with authz in the app layer is that different apps can have different access models with varying complexity, especially the more granular you get (e.g. Implementing fine grained access to specific objects/resources - like Google Docs). Personally, I think a rebac (relationship/graph based) approach works best for apps because permissions in applications are mostly relational and/or... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • How to Do Authorization - A Decision Framework: Part 1
    Let's use warrant.dev as an example. The system provides a set of REST APIs for you to define object types and access policies (called warrants). The general process is first to create object types using HTTP POST:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • A guide to Auth & Access Control in web apps 🔐
    Https://warrant.dev/ (Provider) Relatively new authZ provider, they have a dashboard where you can manage your rules in a central location and then use them from multiple languages via their SDKs, even on the client to perform UI checks. Rules can also be managed programmatically via SDK. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Show HN: Open-Source, Google Zanzibar Inspired Authorization Service
    Hey HN, I recently shared my thoughts on why Google Zanzibar is a great solution for implementing authorization[1] and why we decided to build Warrant’s core authz service using key concepts from the Zanzibar paper. As I mentioned in the post, we recently open sourced the authz service powering our managed cloud service, Warrant Cloud[2], so I thought I’d share it with everyone here. Cheers! [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Topaz.sh and Warrant, you can also consider the following products

authzed - The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions

Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.

Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes

Ory - Developer-first Access Management

Oso - A batteries-included system for authorization.

Permify - Permify-Gorm is an open-source library for adding granular permissions and role management to your SaaS apps, so you can get the market faster.