Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Tokio VS Finagle

Compare Tokio VS Finagle and see what are their differences

Tokio logo Tokio

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Concurrency Frameworks

Finagle logo Finagle

Finagle is a protocol-agnostic RPC system.
  • Tokio Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • Finagle Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-09

Tokio features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Finagle features and specs

  • Scalability
    Finagle is designed to work in highly concurrent environments and easily scales to handle thousands of requests per second, making it suitable for applications with high throughput requirements.
  • Protocol Agnostic
    Finagle provides support for a wide range of protocols such as HTTP, Thrift, and more, allowing developers to integrate it with various network services without being tied to a specific protocol.
  • Asynchronous and Non-blocking
    It uses asynchronous I/O and provides a non-blocking architecture that facilitates efficient resource utilization and improved application responsiveness.
  • Resilience Features
    Includes built-in mechanisms for implementing retries, circuit breakers, and deadlines, enhancing the resilience of client-server communication.
  • Built-in Load Balancing
    Comes with built-in load balancing that helps distribute requests evenly across service instances, thus improving application performance and reliability.
  • Extensible and Modular
    Finagle's architecture is modular, allowing developers to extend or modify its functionality as needed by customizing different components.

Possible disadvantages of Finagle

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The library is complex and offers a rich set of features, which may be overwhelming to new users or developers unfamiliar with asynchronous programming patterns.
  • Limited Documentation
    The documentation for Finagle is sometimes sparse or outdated, which can make it difficult for developers to find information and best practices.
  • JVM Dependency
    Finagle is built on the JVM and primarily used with Scala or Java, which may limit its use in environments where these languages are not preferred.
  • Ecosystem Dependency
    Being a part of Twitter's ecosystem, changes or discontinuation in support can have significant impacts on long-term projects using Finagle.
  • Performance Overhead
    While designed for high concurrency, the abstraction layers and features can introduce performance overhead which might not be suitable for extremely latency-sensitive applications.

Tokio videos

adidas TOKIO SOLAR HU x Pharrell x Nigo Friendship Collab Review + On Feet!

More videos:

  • Review - ON FEET REVIEW Adidas x Human Made Tokio Solars by Nigo - Watch & Decide For Yourself! #Lowheat

Finagle videos

Bagel Review - Finagle a Bagel (Boston, MA)

More videos:

  • Review - Twitter's Finagle for the Asynchronous Programmer
  • Review - Finagle a Bagel (Phantom Gourmet)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tokio and Finagle)
Javascript UI Libraries
52 52%
48% 48
Front-End Frameworks
48 48%
52% 52
JS Library
45 45%
55% 55
Application And Data
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Tokio and Finagle. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Finagle seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tokio mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Tokio yet. Tracking of Tokio recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Finagle mentions (12)

  • Features of Project Loom incorporated in Java 21
    Not sure about now but a few years back the company I worked for was heavily vested in Finagle [1] using Future pools. I'm sure virtual threads would only enhance this framework. Also, Spring and it's reactive webflux would probably benefit as well [2]. [1] https://twitter.github.io/finagle/ [2] https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webflux/reactive-spring.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Twitter (re)Releases Recommendation Algorithm on GitHub
    Don't really see how "enterprise scala" has anything to do with this, scala is meant to be parallelized , that's like it's whole thing with akka / actors / twitter's finagle (https://twitter.github.io/finagle/). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Pretty incredible thread where Elon confuses how GraphQL works, thinks the Android client itself is making one thousand requests, and then publicly fires an employee who corrects him.
    Bro it's their fucking project lolhttps://twitter.github.io/finagle/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pretty incredible thread where Elon confuses how GraphQL works, thinks the Android client itself is making one thousand requests, and then publicly fires an employee who corrects him.
    You can even see it mentioned in Finagle's project, which is what Twitter uses https://twitter.github.io/finagle/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Elon Musk publicly feuding with and firing his developers on Twitter
    RPC generally means server side calls, probably this https://twitter.github.io/finagle/, and XHR is not RPC. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tokio and Finagle, you can also consider the following products

RxJS - Reactive Extensions for Javascript

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

Akka - Build powerful reactive, concurrent, and distributed applications in Java and Scala

Conc - Better structured concurrency for go. Contribute to sourcegraph/conc development by creating an account on GitHub.

MobX - Simple, scalable state management

react-context - Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.