Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Thunder Client VS Oxygen XML Editor

Compare Thunder Client VS Oxygen XML Editor and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Thunder Client logo Thunder Client

Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative

Oxygen XML Editor logo Oxygen XML Editor

Oxygen XML Editor provides a comprehensive suite of XML authoring and development tools.
  • Thunder Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Oxygen XML Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09

Thunder Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Thunder Client offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to create and manage API requests without getting overwhelmed by complex features.
  • VS Code Integration
    Being an extension for Visual Studio Code, it is convenient for developers who already use VS Code, enabling seamless API testing within their development environment.
  • Lightweight
    Compared to other API testing tools, Thunder Client is lightweight, making it ideal for users who need a quick and simple solution for testing APIs without extensive configuration.
  • Environment Variables
    The tool allows the use of environment variables, enabling users to manage different environments effectively and switch between them easily.
  • Support for Collections
    Supports organizing requests into collections, allowing for efficient management and categorization of related requests.

Possible disadvantages of Thunder Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Thunder Client lacks some of the advanced features found in more robust API testing tools, such as automation scripts and extensive plugin support.
  • Dependency on VS Code
    As a VS Code extension, it requires Visual Studio Code to run. This dependency can be a drawback for users who prefer other code editors or standalone applications.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Unlike some other API testing tools, Thunder Client does not have built-in collaboration features, which can limit its use in team environments.
  • Platform Specific
    It is primarily designed for use within Visual Studio Code, which may not be ideal for users who work across multiple platforms or require a standalone solution.

Oxygen XML Editor features and specs

  • Comprehensive XML Support
    Oxygen XML Editor offers extensive support for XML and related technologies, making it suitable for working with XSLT, XQuery, XPath, and more. This makes it a versatile tool for developers dealing with XML data.
  • Schema Validation
    It provides robust validation against numerous schema languages including DTD, XML Schema, and Relax NG, ensuring data integrity and compliance with standards.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The editor features an intuitive and customizable user interface that helps both novices and experienced users navigate and edit XML documents efficiently.
  • Extensive Plugin and API Support
    Oxygen XML Editor supports a wide range of plugins and APIs, allowing for enhanced functionality and integration with other tools and workflows.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    It is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing flexibility for users in different operating system environments.

Possible disadvantages of Oxygen XML Editor

  • High Cost
    One of the main disadvantages is its cost. The software is relatively expensive, which can be a barrier for small teams or individual developers.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Given its extensive features and capabilities, new users may find it challenging to master all aspects of the editor without significant time investment.
  • Resource Intensive
    Oxygen XML Editor can be resource-heavy, potentially causing performance issues on lower-spec hardware.
  • Occasional Overload of Features
    For users who only need basic XML editing capabilities, the plethora of advanced features may be overwhelming and unnecessary.
  • Limited Support for Non-XML Formats
    While it excels at XML-related tasks, it is not as strong when dealing with non-XML file formats, which may require additional tools for comprehensive project management.

Thunder Client videos

+ Add

Thunder Client - API testing right inside VSCode

More videos:

  • Review - Do you really need Postman? | Use Thunder Client - VSCode extension | Easy & Lightweight
  • Review - Thunder client - Vscode extension | Say no to Postman

Oxygen XML Editor videos

+ Add

oXygen XML Editor - Review Panel

More videos:

  • Review - Collaboration and Document Review in oXygen XML Editor 18

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Thunder Client and Oxygen XML Editor)

Thunder Client

Oxygen XML Editor

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
APIs
0% 0
Task Management
0 0%
Task Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Thunder Client and Oxygen XML Editor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Thunder Client and Oxygen XML Editor

Thunder Client Reviews

Best Postman Alternatives To Consider in 2025
This free, feature-rich extension integrates seamlessly with VSCode, making it ideal for developers who prefer a unified environment. Thunder Client offers collection management, environment variables, and basic automation capabilities. It stands out for its tight integration with VSCode's debugging tools.
Source: www.hypertest.co
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Thunder Client is a Vscode Postman alternative that runs as a Visual Studio Code extension (not open source). Its design focuses on simple and efficient HTTP clients while constructing or connecting with APIs. Thunder Client can handle a wide range of API requests. It effectively processes immense amounts of data simultaneously while not slowing down the VS Code program.
Source: testsigma.com
Top 5 Postman alternatives
Thunder Client is a VS Code extension focusing on being a simple and efficient HTTP client while building or integrating with APIs. It supports collections as a way to group relevant requests. Moreover, ThunderClient supports the concept of Environment and Environment Variables to store and re-use values within multiple requests. Finally, ThunderClinet offers a UI that you...
Source: testfully.io

Oxygen XML Editor Reviews

We have no reviews of Oxygen XML Editor yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Thunder Client and Oxygen XML Editor, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Altova XMLSpy - The XMLSpy XML Editor is a powerful tool for editing XML and related technologies. It is the only XML Editor with patented SmartFix validation, enterprise-grade editors, converters, debuggers, and code generators.

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

XML Copy Editor - XML Copy Editor is a fast, free, validating XML editor.

EchoAPI - Next-gen API development collaboration platform. More than just API design, debug, test, load-testing, and mock.

XMLable - XMLable is an online toolbox designed for working with XML, offering tools such as a formatter, validator, comparator, generator, XPath tester, XSD generator, and XSL transformation.

Loading...