Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Three.js VS Magic Animations CSS3

Compare Three.js VS Magic Animations CSS3 and see what are their differences

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Magic Animations CSS3 logo Magic Animations CSS3

CSS3 Animations with special effects.
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • Magic Animations CSS3 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Magic Animations CSS3 features and specs

  • Easy to Implement
    Magic Animations CSS3 offers a user-friendly approach to adding animations, requiring only simple class names to implement.
  • Variety of Animations
    The library provides a diverse range of animations, allowing developers to choose from many predefined effects to suit their project's needs.
  • Lightweight
    Magic Animations is lightweight, which ensures minimal impact on page load times while still providing high-quality animations.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations are designed to work across different web browsers, ensuring that users have a consistent experience.

Possible disadvantages of Magic Animations CSS3

  • Limited Customization
    While Magic Animations offers many predefined animations, fine-tuning these animations to better fit specific project needs may be difficult without deeper modification.
  • Dependence on CSS3
    As the library is based on CSS3, it might not be fully compatible with older browsers that do not support CSS3 features.
  • No Built-in Support for Complex Interactions
    Magic Animations focuses on simple animations and does not provide built-in support for more complex interactions or animations tied to scroll events and other triggers.
  • Lack of Documentation
    The documentation for Magic Animations is minimal, which could lead to confusion or difficulty in implementing specific animations effectively.

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Magic Animations CSS3 videos

No Magic Animations CSS3 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and Magic Animations CSS3)
Javascript UI Libraries
90 90%
10% 10
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
0% 0
Charting Libraries
79 79%
21% 21

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and Magic Animations CSS3. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and Magic Animations CSS3

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Magic Animations CSS3 Reviews

We have no reviews of Magic Animations CSS3 yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 247 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (247)

  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Optimizing Three.js: 4 Key Techniques
    But code can also create something visually stunning, something everyone can appreciate. This is where tools like Three.js shine. However, Three.js can be heavy, especially when used in a dynamic web page accessed by devices with varying computational power. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

Magic Animations CSS3 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Magic Animations CSS3 yet. Tracking of Magic Animations CSS3 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and Magic Animations CSS3, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Animo.js - Animo.js is a lightweight, open-source tool that enables developers to manipulate animations and transitions.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Move.js - Move.js is a mini Javascript library that provides CSS3 animations.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library