Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Three.js VS interviewing.io

Compare Three.js VS interviewing.io and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

interviewing.io logo interviewing.io

Free, anonymous technical interview practice
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • interviewing.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

interviewing.io features and specs

  • Anonymity
    Interviewing.io allows candidates to remain anonymous during the interview process, which can help reduce bias and make candidates more comfortable.
  • High-quality practice
    The platform provides opportunities to practice with real engineers from top tech companies, offering high-quality feedback and experience.
  • Cost-effective
    Many features on Interviewing.io are free, including the ability to conduct practice interviews and access to recordings and feedback.
  • Feedback and metrics
    Candidates receive detailed feedback and performance metrics after each interview, helping them identify areas of improvement.
  • Networking
    The platform can provide valuable networking opportunities by connecting candidates with engineers and potential employers from top tech companies.

Possible disadvantages of interviewing.io

  • Limited industry focus
    Interviewing.io primarily focuses on tech interviews, so it may not be useful for candidates looking for practice in other industries.
  • Variable interviewer quality
    The quality of interviewers can vary, which might affect the consistency of the practice and feedback received.
  • Scheduling challenges
    Finding convenient times for interviews can sometimes be challenging, especially if both the candidate and interviewer have busy schedules.
  • Stress and performance pressure
    Despite being a practice platform, candidates might still experience stress and performance pressure, similar to real interview scenarios.
  • Limited personalization
    The feedback and practice sessions are somewhat standardized, which may not always cater to the specific needs or unique backgrounds of individual candidates.

Analysis of interviewing.io

Overall verdict

  • Interviewing.io is considered a good resource for individuals looking to improve their technical interviewing skills. It is particularly beneficial due to its anonymous nature, which encourages honest feedback and reduces anxiety, and the quality of interviewers involved, who often come from well-known tech companies.

Why this product is good

  • Interviewing.io is a platform designed to help candidates practice technical interviewing through mock interviews, which can be especially useful for those aiming to enter fields such as software engineering. It offers anonymous practice sessions with engineers from top tech companies, providing real-world experience and feedback. The platform also offers flexible scheduling, expert insights, and resources to improve interview performance.

Recommended for

  • Aspiring software engineers
  • Recent computer science graduates
  • Professionals transitioning into tech roles
  • Individuals preparing for technical interviews at major tech companies

Three.js videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

interviewing.io videos

+ Add

Technical Interviewing Anonymous: Aline Lerner, CEO @ Interviewing.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and interviewing.io)

Three.js

interviewing.io

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Online Learning
0 0%
Online Learning
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
Flowcharts
0% 0
Online Education
0 0%
Online Education
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and interviewing.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and interviewing.io

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

interviewing.io Reviews

The Best Code Interview Prep Platforms in 2020
Interviewing.io takes a very unique approach to coding interview prep. Rather than providing content and practice coding challenges, Interviewing.io has a library of actual video interviews that you can watch, and you can pay to anonymously take a mock interview with an engineering hiring manager.
Source: www.freecodecamp.org

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js should be more popular than interviewing.io. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

interviewing.io mentions (99)

  • How to Become a Backend Developer in 2025 ?
    Interviewing.io – Anonymous mock interview platform with real engineers from top tech companies. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My Journey of Mastering Data Structures and Algorithms in 6 Months: Dos and Don'ts👩🏻‍💻
    Conduct Mock Interviews: Simulate interview scenarios using platforms like Pramp or Interviewing.io. This helps you manage time, pressure, and articulating your thought process. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Rebooting (something like) early Triplebyte
    How is this different than https://interviewing.io/ ? - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: Any previous experience with interviewing.io dedicated coaches?
    Interviewing.io[1] lets users to practice mock interviews (coding interviews) with peers or professional interviewers. These interviews are anonymous. They also offer mentorship sessions with “dedicated coaches” from FAANG or other backgrounds. They claim 99% satisfaction rate and 82% of success (landing a job in the desired company). It sounds really vague and difficult to verify due to the anonymous aspect. Does... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Guidance for cracking coding interviews
    There is also https://interviewing.io/, but that platform is a rip off. Either you need to pay an arm and a leg, or you need to trade two interviews that you do for others in exchange for a single interview that you receive. Pramp is much better in that respect. With Pramp, you interview the other job-hunter for 30 minutes and they interview you for 30 minutes. It's a much fairer exchange. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and interviewing.io, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

AlgoExpert.io - A better way to prep for tech interviews

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

LeetCode - Practice and level up your development skills and prepare for technical interviews.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Interview Cake - Free practice programming interview questions. Interview Cake helps you prep for interviews to land offers at companies like Google and Facebook.

Loading...