Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Three.js VS Apptivate

Compare Three.js VS Apptivate and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Apptivate logo Apptivate

A simple, beautiful hotkey manager.
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • Apptivate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-14

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Apptivate features and specs

  • Streamlined App Launching
    Apptivate allows users to quickly launch applications using customizable keyboard shortcuts, enhancing productivity by reducing the time spent searching for and opening software.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features an intuitive and minimalistic design, making it easy for users to configure shortcuts without a steep learning curve.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Apptivate runs with minimal impact on system resources, ensuring that it doesn't slow down your computer while providing its shortcut functionalities.
  • Customization
    Users have the flexibility to create and manage shortcuts tailored to their specific needs, increasing efficiency in daily tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apptivate

  • Limited to macOS
    Apptivate is only available for macOS users, restricting its accessibility to Windows or Linux platforms.
  • Basic Functionality
    While effective for launching apps, it lacks advanced features found in more comprehensive productivity tools, such as integrated search or automation capabilities.
  • No Free Version
    Apptivate doesn't offer a free version, which may deter users looking for a no-cost solution for managing application shortcuts.
  • Lack of Updates
    There are limited updates and new features, which may not meet evolving user needs or address potential software bugs over time.

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Apptivate videos

Apptivate - Mac Madness Monday

More videos:

  • Demo - Apptivate Demo
  • Review -  Application Review: Apptivate

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and Apptivate)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
0% 0
Mac
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and Apptivate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and Apptivate

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Apptivate Reviews

We have no reviews of Apptivate yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

Apptivate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apptivate yet. Tracking of Apptivate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and Apptivate, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Alfred - Alfred is an award-winning app for macOS which boosts your efficiency with hotkeys, keywords, text expansion and more. Search your Mac and the web, and be more productive with custom actions to control your Mac.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Keysmith - Create custom keyboard shortcuts for your Mac and the web

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Power Menu for Finder - The workflow enhancing Finder extension for Mac