Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Three.js VS Amtrak.js

Compare Three.js VS Amtrak.js and see what are their differences

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Amtrak.js logo Amtrak.js

Amtrak.js is a super simple and easy way to interact with the Amtrak's train tracking API in both Node.js and the browser.
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • Amtrak.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Amtrak.js features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    Amtrak.js provides a straightforward interface for integrating with Amtrak's API, making it accessible for developers to implement train schedule and booking functionalities into their applications.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The package comes with detailed documentation that helps developers quickly understand how to use the library's features, saving time and effort during the development process.
  • Active Community Support
    Amtrak.js benefits from an active community, offering support and resources through forums and contributions, which can be invaluable when encountering issues or seeking enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Amtrak.js

  • Limited Functionality
    The library may have limited capabilities compared to directly accessing the Amtrak API, potentially lacking some advanced features needed for specific application requirements.
  • Dependency Maintenance
    As with any third-party library, developers need to ensure that Amtrak.js is regularly updated and compatible with their project, as dependencies can introduce security vulnerabilities and require ongoing maintenance.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    Using Amtrak.js might introduce additional layers of abstraction, which could potentially result in performance overhead compared to a custom solution directly interacting with Amtrak's API.

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Amtrak.js videos

No Amtrak.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and Amtrak.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
0% 0
Charting Libraries
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and Amtrak.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and Amtrak.js

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Amtrak.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Amtrak.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than Amtrak.js. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Amtrak.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 15 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

Amtrak.js mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and Amtrak.js, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Zdog - 3D javascript engine for canvas and SVG

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

particles.js - A lightweight JavaScript library for creating particles.