Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

The Unlicense VS Flatpak

Compare The Unlicense VS Flatpak and see what are their differences

The Unlicense logo The Unlicense

The Unlicense is a template for disclaiming copyright monopoly interest in software you've written; in other words, it is a template for dedicating your software to the public domain.

Flatpak logo Flatpak

Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux
  • The Unlicense Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-25
  • Flatpak Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-06

The Unlicense videos

No The Unlicense videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Flatpak videos

How to Use Flatpak

More videos:

  • Review - [2018] LINUX - FLATPAK REVIEW and SETUP
  • Review - Matador FlatPak Toiletry Bottle Review | TSA Approved | Small Travel Container & Liquid Soap Holder

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to The Unlicense and Flatpak)
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using The Unlicense and Flatpak. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flatpak should be more popular than The Unlicense. It has been mentiond 84 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

The Unlicense mentions (38)

  • French Court Issues Damages Award for Violation of GPL
    It's theoretically helpful to at least put in a no-warranties clause. But sqlite as maybe the most popular public domain project worldwide doesn't (instead having a blessing). I mostly settled on the Unlicense https://unlicense.org/ over just saying 'public domain' or 'CC0' as a simple text blob to paste in, and in the event of a significant contribution from someone else, there's a simple text blurb to ask them... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Game-icons.net: Free icons for your games
    No, you're confused, because this is confusing: https://unlicense.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlicense So if something is unlicensed (no license) you would be correct, but if something is unlicensed (unlicensed licence) you would be incorrect.. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • We need more of Richard Stallman, not less
    CC0[0] would be the obvious one; spicier and less legalese alternatives that nonetheless amount to about the same thing include the Unlicense[1] and the Do What the Fuck You Want License[2] [0] https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/ [1] https://unlicense.org/ with some philosophical discussion at https://ar.to/2010/01/set-your-code-free [2] http://www.wtfpl.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Scripting and licensing - Do bash scripts need a license?
    Interesting, looks like the Open Source Initiative decided to pull their endorsement of CC0 over the same clause. Apparently OSI decided to approve Unilicense as a public-domain equivalent license. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is there any controversy around the Eden Project mod?
    So its licensed on github under the Unlicenced License which TL:DR means anyone can modify it and publish it for any reason. Besides, I don't think a single line of code from the original FT UI mod is in my FT UI mod. At that point if you still consider it stealing, I don't know what to tell it, it only changes a single byte of code. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Flatpak mentions (84)

  • Tools for Linux Distro Hoppers
    Hopping from one distro to another with a different package manager might require some time to adapt. Using a package manager that can be installed on most distro is one way to help you get to work faster. Flatpak is one of them; other alternative are Snap, Nix or Homebrew. Flatpak is a good starter, and if you have a bunch of free time, I suggest trying Nix. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • I cannot get flatpak to find anything on a fresh Debian12 install
    The repository that I used is the official one from flathub.org, I literally typed:. Source: 10 months ago
  • Modern CSV version 2 is now available
    It shouldn't be too complicated to create a package from the provided tarball. [1]: https://flatpak.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Flutter 3 on Devuan 4: Getting started
    Besides, there may be other ways to install them, although there doesn't seem no such Flatpak packages in Flathub. For example, some senerio to use some release channel or Docker / Podman. Additionally, when you use a different Linux distro where systemd is adopted and therefore can do Snaps (Snapd), you have another possibility. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Android Studio on Devuan 4: Install
    Besides, there is another way to install Android Studio on Devuan: Flatpak. They have the package. Moreover, when you use a different Linux distro and can use Snaps, there is also the package. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing The Unlicense and Flatpak, you can also consider the following products

MIT License - A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.

AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Simplified BSD License - Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS