Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

The State of JavaScript 2018 VS Transifex

Compare The State of JavaScript 2018 VS Transifex and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

The State of JavaScript 2018 logo The State of JavaScript 2018

Discover the latest trends in the JavaScript ecosystem

Transifex logo Transifex

Transifex makes it easy to collect, translate and deliver digital content, web and mobile apps in multiple languages. Localization for agile teams.
  • The State of JavaScript 2018 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-10
  • Transifex Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17

The State of JavaScript 2018 features and specs

  • Comprehensive Data
    The survey offers a wide range of data on JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and tools, providing a broad overview of the ecosystem in 2018.
  • Community Insights
    It offers insights directly from JavaScript developers, reflecting trends, preferences, and challenges faced by the community.
  • Historical Reference
    Serves as a historical reference point to track the evolution and adoption of different technologies in the JavaScript world over the years.
  • Visual Presentation
    Includes charts and graphs that make the information easy to digest and understand trends quickly.
  • Segmented Analysis
    Provides segmented analysis of different aspects of JavaScript such as frameworks, testing, state management, etc., for more targeted insights.

Possible disadvantages of The State of JavaScript 2018

  • Potential Bias
    The survey could be subject to self-selection bias, as it depends on who chooses to participate.
  • Time-Sensitive Data
    Being from 2018, the survey data is outdated, and the JavaScript ecosystem evolves rapidly, possibly limiting its current relevance.
  • Limited Demographics
    May not accurately represent all JavaScript developers globally, particularly those from underrepresented regions or communities.
  • Depth vs. Breadth
    While comprehensive, some areas may lack depth in insights compared to focused, specialized surveys or studies.
  • Interpretation Challenges
    The results and trends can be challenging to interpret without considering external factors influencing the JavaScript ecosystem.

Transifex features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Transifex offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, enabling users to manage translations efficiently, even if they are not tech-savvy.
  • Collaboration Tools
    It provides robust collaboration tools, allowing multiple translators and reviewers to work together seamlessly on the same project.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Transifex can be integrated with various development and content management tools, such as GitHub, WordPress, and more, streamlining the localization workflow.
  • Support for Multiple File Formats
    Transifex supports a wide range of file formats, including JSON, YAML, CSV, and more, making it adaptable for various types of projects.
  • Automated Workflows
    It offers automated workflows that can help speed up the translation process and reduce manual effort, such as auto-detection of new content and machine translation suggestions.
  • Scalability
    Transifex is designed to support projects of all sizes, from small apps to large-scale enterprise solutions, making it a versatile choice for businesses as they grow.

Possible disadvantages of Transifex

  • Cost
    Transifex can be expensive, especially for smaller companies or individual users who may find the pricing plans to be a significant investment.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all the features and functionalities effectively.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    Transifex primarily operates as a cloud-based solution, which means offline capabilities are limited, potentially posing issues in environments with unreliable internet access.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow load times and glitches, particularly with large projects involving many languages and text strings.
  • Customer Support
    While customer support is generally responsive, some users have experienced delays and felt that the level of support could be improved.
  • Complex API
    For developers, the Transifex API is powerful but can be complex to implement and requires a good understanding of both the API and the user’s own codebase.

The State of JavaScript 2018 videos

No The State of JavaScript 2018 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Transifex videos

Getting Started with Transifex

More videos:

  • Review - Translating Video Subtitles in Transifex

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to The State of JavaScript 2018 and Transifex)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Localization
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Website Localization
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using The State of JavaScript 2018 and Transifex. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing The State of JavaScript 2018 and Transifex, you can also consider the following products

JavaScript.com - A free resource for learning and developing in JavaScript

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

BundlePhobia - Find the performance impact of adding a npm package to your bundle.

POEditor - The translation and localization management platform that's easy to use *and* affordable!

JavaScript Operator Lookup - A full list of JavaScript operators with examples

Lokalise - Localization tool for software developers. Web-based collaborative multi-platform editor, API/CLI, numerous plugins, iOS and Android SDK.