Software Alternatives & Reviews

The Security Checklist VS Signed Pages

Compare The Security Checklist VS Signed Pages and see what are their differences

The Security Checklist logo The Security Checklist

The Practical Security Checklist for Web Developers

Signed Pages logo Signed Pages

A browser extension to verify the authenticity of websites
  • The Security Checklist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07
  • Signed Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to The Security Checklist and Signed Pages)
Developer Tools
73 73%
27% 27
SaaS
64 64%
36% 36
Tech
58 58%
42% 42
Sales
71 71%
29% 29

User comments

Share your experience with using The Security Checklist and Signed Pages. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Signed Pages seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

The Security Checklist mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of The Security Checklist yet. Tracking of The Security Checklist recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Signed Pages mentions (12)

  • E2EE on the web: is the web that bad?
    There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Cloudflare and CDNs - call for community opinions
    EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users. Source: 11 months ago
  • Truly safe?
    There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Security experts declare all Proton apps secure after security audit
    > The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different). In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • ProtonMail Is Inherently Insecure, Your Emails Are Likely Compromised
    Something like a browser extension for this does already exist, fortunately: https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing The Security Checklist and Signed Pages, you can also consider the following products

Marshal - Quickly scan your cloud for exposed sensitive information.

Trustpage - Building trust with customers just got easier

Google Capture the Flag 2017 - Google's 2nd annual worldwide security competition

The SaaS CTO Security Checklist - The security checklist all CTOs should follow

WordPress Security Scanner - Check if your WordPress site has known vulnerabilities

Startup Security Program by Templarbit - Security practices & tools required to close large deals