Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

the full wiki VS Reference.com

Compare the full wiki VS Reference.com and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

the full wiki logo the full wiki

We find similar sentences to those in Wikipedia, complete with their citations for you to paste...

Reference.com logo Reference.com

Reference.com is the #1 question answering service that delivers the best answers from the web and real people - all in one place.
  • the full wiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-12
  • Reference.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27

the full wiki features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Reference.com features and specs

  • Comprehensive Information
    Reference.com provides a broad range of information across various topics, making it a versatile resource for quick fact-checking and general knowledge.
  • Search Functionality
    The website features a user-friendly search bar that allows users to quickly find information on specific queries without navigating through multiple categories.
  • Accessible Language
    Content on Reference.com is often written in clear and accessible language, making it easy for users of all ages and education levels to understand.
  • Free Access
    Most of the content on Reference.com is available for free, allowing users to access a wealth of information without any subscription or cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of Reference.com

  • Advertisements
    The site contains numerous advertisements, which can be distracting and may detract from the user experience by slowing down page load times.
  • Generalized Information
    Due to its broad focus, some information on Reference.com can be generalized and may lack depth compared to specialized resources.
  • Source Credibility
    The credibility of the information can vary, as Reference.com aggregates content from a variety of sources, some of which may not be highly reputable.
  • Lack of Academic References
    The website does not consistently provide sources or citations for its information, which can be a drawback for users seeking verified academic references.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to the full wiki and Reference.com)
Wikis And Discussion Spaces
Translation Service
0 0%
100% 100
Content Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Languages
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using the full wiki and Reference.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Reference.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

the full wiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of the full wiki yet. Tracking of the full wiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Reference.com mentions (13)

  • Name a player who is a “legend” for your team, but was never that good
    This wasn't for my team but, I was looking in this comment section for any mention of Billy Butler. Couldn't find any after maybe 2-3 minutes of looking. I remembered him being better than his stats on baseball-reference.com say he is. Maybe that was because I used to play a lot of MLB 2K11 when I was a younger. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [Newbie] Is my Powered USB Hub too close to my HF+ Discovery?
    You can use WSJT-X,FLDigi,and other programs with the sdr software,but I'm no help there,as I use ham transcievers for digital. Look on radio https://reference.com for just about anything that you're interested in. It even has a state by state section.along with a database for cities and counties. You can spend a long time on that site,and learn a lot. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [US] This or That? - Which of these baby animals is known as a pup? [08-15-2022]
    I think a lot of this depends on the site from where Microsoft culls their answers. For rat, the first that pops up when selecting it says a baby rat is a "kit," but if you search, it changes. Squeaks and nibbles says, "A baby rat is called a kitten or a pup," whereas reference.com says "a baby rat is called a pup.". Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Michael Kay on the Rich Eisen Show: "The #Yankees will not overpay for Aaron Judge, Based on what I've been hearing around Aaron Judge wants to be the highest paid position player, and would want $36M+ a year"
    Baseball reference.com shows him at 0 runs on defense, so perfectly average. NOt sure what you're looking at. I suppose statcast? I will have a look there. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • The conspiracy chart. Flat earth is exactly where I expected to find it.
    The TOP response (reference.com) says 800f open air to 1500 ideal. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing the full wiki and Reference.com, you can also consider the following products

Encyclopædia Britannica - Explore the fact-checked online encyclopedia from Encyclopaedia Britannica with hundreds of thousands of objective articles, biographies, videos, and images from experts.

Google Translate - Google's free service instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages.

Wikipedia - Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

Everipedia - The world's largest english encyclopedia

DeepL Translator - DeepL Translator is a machine translator that currently supports 42 language combinations.