Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TextUs VS Converse.JS

Compare TextUs VS Converse.JS and see what are their differences

TextUs logo TextUs

TextUs is the leading businesses texting platform for professionals.

Converse.JS logo Converse.JS

A free and open-source chat client for your website
  • TextUs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-09
  • Converse.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

TextUs videos

Textus Receptus (Trinitarian Bible Society) Review

More videos:

  • Review - Review | The Textus Receptus Bible In Hebrew And Greek By TBS
  • Review - WM 180: Review: Jan Krans, Why The Textus Receptus Cannot Be Accepted

Converse.JS videos

Real-Time Chat on the Web How to use XMPP and Converse.js to integrate webchat into any website

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TextUs and Converse.JS)
Customer Support
86 86%
14% 14
Business & Commerce
100 100%
0% 0
Help Desk
67 67%
33% 33
Live Chat
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using TextUs and Converse.JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Converse.JS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TextUs mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TextUs yet. Tracking of TextUs recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Converse.JS mentions (9)

  • An actually private messaging self hosted server
    I agree. IMHO the best variant is then to use something that is truely free. Like XMPP. There are a lot of servers and many clients to chose from and I can strongly recommend converse.js as a web client. It supports different ways of end to end encryption but I would recommend OMEMO which is basically the same encryption idea that you find in Signal. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Xmpp Bot with its own address.
    Hello, I recently started exploring xmpp, with snikket app and conversejs.org. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Matrix was worth the effort to self host.
    It is Converse.js (https://conversejs.org/) packaged into a one-click install for openfire (from the web admin). So, one-click install for an xmpp web client. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • No white list registering with conversejs.org
    Tried to register with conversejs.org today and got an error "your IP is not whitelisted". Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TextUs and Converse.JS, you can also consider the following products

Intercom - Intercom is a customer relationship management and messaging tool for web businesses. Build relationships with users to create loyal customers.

tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page

JivoChat - JivoChat is a live chat that enables you to talk to visitors on your website

Rocket.Chat - Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework.

Userlike - Userlike is free live chat software for website and mobile support.

Live Guide - Live chat for websites is online communication with your visitors. Secure live chat solution that can be tailor-made to fit your requirements.