Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Textures.com VS Gio.js

Compare Textures.com VS Gio.js and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Textures.com logo Textures.com

Textures.com is a website that offers digital pictures of all sorts of materials.

Gio.js logo Gio.js

3D globe info visualization library built with Three.js
  • Textures.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • Gio.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Textures.com features and specs

  • Wide Variety
    Textures.com offers a vast library of textures, covering a wide range of categories, making it suitable for multiple projects.
  • High Quality
    The textures available on Textures.com are of high quality, often including high-resolution images suitable for professional use.
  • Frequent Updates
    The website is regularly updated with new textures, ensuring that users have access to the latest and most diverse materials.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The site features a well-organized and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to find and download the textures they need.
  • Free Options
    Textures.com offers a selection of free textures, which can be quite useful for beginners or those on a tight budget.

Possible disadvantages of Textures.com

  • Limited Free Downloads
    Free accounts are limited in the number of textures they can download per day, which may be restrictive for some users.
  • Subscription Cost
    Access to the full range of high-resolution textures requires a paid subscription, which might be expensive for some users.
  • File Size
    High-resolution textures can be quite large in file size, which may slow down download times and take up significant storage space.
  • Watermarked Previews
    Free previews of textures are often watermarked, which makes it difficult to assess their suitability before downloading the full quality version.
  • Search Limitations
    The search functionality, while generally good, can sometimes be less effective in finding highly specific textures.

Gio.js features and specs

  • Interactive 3D Globe
    Gio.js allows users to create visually appealing, interactive 3D globe visualizations that can enhance data representation and user engagement.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is designed to be user-friendly, making it accessible for developers with varying levels of expertise in JavaScript and WebGL.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Gio.js provides the flexibility to modify and extend the library to suit custom requirements, and fosters community collaboration.
  • Data-Driven
    Gio.js supports easy integration of geo-spatial data, enabling users to create data-driven visualizations that are meaningful and informative.
  • Customizability
    The library offers various customization options for the globe’s appearance, animations, and data points, allowing for tailored visualizations.

Possible disadvantages of Gio.js

  • Performance Limitations
    Rendering complex or large datasets may result in performance issues, as the library is dependent on WebGL capabilities and client device performance.
  • Limited Features
    While useful for specific applications, Gio.js might lack advanced features and flexibility compared to more mature 3D visualization libraries.
  • Documentation and Community Support
    As a relatively niche tool, users might find limited resources and community support, potentially making troubleshooting more difficult.
  • Dependency on External Libraries
    Gio.js requires other libraries such as Three.js, which means there is an additional learning curve and complexity for setup and development.

Textures.com videos

+ Add

Textures.com / CG Textures (Review)

More videos:

Gio.js videos

No Gio.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Textures.com and Gio.js)

Textures.com

Gio.js

Photos & Graphics
100 100%
Photos & Graphics
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
Online Services
100 100%
Online Services
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Textures.com and Gio.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Textures.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 179 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Textures.com mentions (179)

  • 🧐 Textures.com - The site where the Mh370 cloud photos were traced back to says there is something odd with their audited logs. Rule 2: Discussion must be on-topic.
    Been using textures.com for a very long time, they are awesome, so all the best to them! Source: over 1 year ago
  • The clouds in Jonas' photos match the clouds in the satellite footage of the same area on January 25th, 2012
    Everybody needs to take a deep breath because something reeks about the Jonas debunk. He may have been manipulated to find altered photos integrated into his legitimate data set. Check out this post today by Textures.com from a post today on X. Also... Another post by Ken S (@KStaubin) today calls into question the legitimacy of the data set. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Jonas, the individual who claims to have taken the "original" cloud pics admits to photo manipulation in the past. Opposition is attacking the videos. We are in the thick of it. More to come later.
    Above, you say it's shady that Jonas is business partners with the texture.com owner, when he literally took photos of those clouds for textures.com, which makes him a business partner. That's why the photos came to exist in the first place. Source: over 1 year ago
  • If the video is a hoax, why would some agency create this video in 2014?
    Video being real, clouds planted by the CIA later except for the 2 or 3 found on archive.org (or maybe they hacked into archive.org), person working for textures.com on twitter is a plant, stock footage altered after the fact to look vaguely like the video. Jonas is a plant. Ashton Forbes is a plant to make the believers look like idiots. Source: over 1 year ago
  • The Aerials0028 image did not get archived in 2012. Here is an explanation. Decide for yourself.
    We can also confirm the photo was on the website as soon as it was re-launched as textures.com in 2016. All of the other images on the website appeared at that time, it was not that single image being uploaded. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Gio.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Gio.js yet. Tracking of Gio.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Textures.com and Gio.js, you can also consider the following products

Poly Haven - Poly Haven (formerly known as Texture Haven) is an online website where you will find scanned textures without any cost and that are of high quality.

Renderpeople - Renderpeople offers scanned human 3D models for visualizations, movies, games, VR & AR.

Texturefun - Texturefun is software that offers high-quality textures in every size, making you download and use any texture in your 3D or 2D models.

The Data Visualisation Catalogue - Reference tool for data visualisation

Seamless PBR Textures - Seamless PBR Textures is one of the intelligent software that utilizes physically based rendering technology that aims to simulate when light reacts with the model.

nivo - nivo provides a rich set of dataviz components

Loading...