No textimg videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, BusyBox seems to be a lot more popular than textimg. While we know about 15 links to BusyBox, we've tracked only 1 mention of textimg. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
> which youplot can't But you could feed them through `textimg`[1] to generate PNGs. [1] https://github.com/jiro4989/textimg. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
On to our second point, which is the cli utilities' implementation. Debian and Ubuntu use gnu's Coreutils while Alpine uses Busybox(remember, we are talking about the most used application container bases. You can install a desktop version of Alpine with GNU coreutils). Here we have the same situation as before, The GNU coreutils are bigger, do more and have a larger attack surface. Busybox is smaller, does not... - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
AWK runs everywhere. Perl and Python do not. Busybox has their own independent AWK implementation. https://busybox.net/ https://frippery.org/busybox/ Also see the first edition of the AWK manual online here: https://archive.org/details/pdfy-MgN0H1joIoDVoIC7. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
A majority of routers are already based on the Linux kernel. Many are just BusyBox. The most common Linux firewalls are iptables and nftables. With the latter being the most popular one due to being around longer. They are really fine grained and powerful. Source: about 1 year ago
Https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/arm64/booting.rst This was my guiding light for a project a while back. It describes what Linux expects "time zero" looks like for the system; whatever operating system is going to boot needs that kind of contract between the boot environment and its own entry point. You can develop a lightweight linux-based OS with that document and a package like https://busybox.net/. Source: about 1 year ago
For libc, we have musl as an alternate implementation. For most coreutils, we have busybox and the BSD coreutils. For desktop environments, you can use something like xfce. Source: over 1 year ago
AnsiLove - ANSI and ASCII art to PNG converter in C
Toybox (Linux command line utilities) - Toybox combines common Linux command line utilities together into a single BSD-licensed executable...
Carbon - Create and share beautiful images of your source code.
Termux - Terminal emulator and Linux environment for Android
Ray.so - Create beautiful images of your code
GNU Core Utilities - The GNU Core Utilities or coreutils is a package of GNU software containing many of the basic...