TestOs VS Reflect.run

TestOs Reviews

1. Minka Castilo    

   Software Engineer at IBM | almost 2 years ago
   Amazing cloud hosted End-to-End Automated Testing Platform

   We were using emulators for Testing applications. But emulators provided only basic analytics of the app performance. The emulator cannot provide CPU and Memory insights like a real device. We were facing many issues in real-time data like GPS, Sensors and gestures, so we opted for TestGrid's TestOS. TestGrid’s Device cloud provides testing on real devices which gives detailed reports on CPU and Memory usage statistics. This solved our problem.

   TestGrid is a really Cost-effective platform for Automated testing. One of the few platforms which provides enhanced results with an easily understandable Feedback system.

   👍 Pros:    Testos is based on rrr (resolve risk rapidly) so you can easily ensure your app's performance with testos, which is built around a custom robust strategy. in addition, you can proficiently conduct performance testing using the testos tool that is way ahead of many of the commercial tools in the industry.|Codeless testing along with a special feature of adding custom scripts upon the user’s wishes. the situation may arise sometimes when we have complex requirements, this can be resolved by adding custom scripts. this makes the product more flexible.

   👎 Cons:    Dependency on the internet. as this product is completely cloud hosted, it cannot be accessed in the absence of the internet unless it is deployed locally.
2. Serife K.    

   Test Analyst at Infosys | almost 2 years ago
   Amazing TestCase Handling and Efficient

   Writing test cases without scripts is so easy that even a person without technical skills would be able to understand and add / modify test cases Detailed reporting from transaction analysis to network logs, everything you need and more

   👍 Pros:    Everything is available at once (testing, devices)|All the reports are saved and can be used for future reference

   👎 Cons:    At first, the ui was not good but now it has been changed, also it was way slower and still can be improved. the error prompt should be more clear
3. David De Groot    

   Automation Tester / Developer at Soft Tech Consulting | almost 2 years ago
   Best tools for Mobile and Web testing

   Easy navigation. Test Data Management. Flexible Supports for Automation Testing

   👍 Pros:    It provides tap and select navigation for creating test cases which are easy to access by anyone.|Its parallel execution on multiple devices makes the testing on devices with different specifications at once and that reduces the time of testing on each device individually.

   👎 Cons:    No cons that i could think of…

Reflect.run Reviews

TestOs mentions (0)

Reflect.run mentions (16)

• How do you full functional/regression tests in Svelte/Sveltekit?

  Playwright is good but there is also other kind of tools like https://reflect.run/ and https://ghostinspector.com/ that are perfect for end user testing. Hope it helps. Source: about 1 year ago

• Ask HN: Best Dev Tool pitches of all time?

  Is it possible to personalize your pitches to individual users? At our startup [1] we try to get straight to point when pitching the product and demo something that is as close as possible to how the person we're talking to would actually use the product. For example, here's a video I just recorded a few minutes ago for someone that I've been talking to via email:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Are you/your team doing manual QA before releases?

  I've definitely had reflect.run on my radar, and agreed on the expensive AF part, mind if I reach out for your thoughts on what lead you/your team down to reflect.run and your experience with it so far? 😄. Source: about 2 years ago

• Are you/your team doing manual QA before releases?

  Checkout reflect.run we just started using it. Expensive AF but pretty nice. Source: about 2 years ago

• Playwright: Automate Chromium, WebKit and Firefox

  Yes definitely, there's lots of products in the QA space trying to tackle the problem you're describing. I'm a co-founder of a no-code product in the space (https://reflect.run). Being no-code has the advantage of enabling all QA testers to build test automation, regardless of coding experience. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago