Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TestDriven.NET VS Visual Assist X

Compare TestDriven.NET VS Visual Assist X and see what are their differences

TestDriven.NET logo TestDriven.NET

TestDriven.Net makes it easy to run unit tests with a single click, anywhere in your Visual Studio...

Visual Assist X logo Visual Assist X

Visual Assist X dramatically reduces application development time with key new features and...
  • TestDriven.NET Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Visual Assist X Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

TestDriven.NET features and specs

  • Integration with Visual Studio
    TestDriven.NET integrates seamlessly with Visual Studio, allowing developers to run tests directly from the IDE, which enhances productivity by keeping workflows within a single environment.
  • Supports Multiple Testing Frameworks
    TestDriven.NET supports a variety of testing frameworks such as NUnit and MSTest, giving developers flexibility in choosing their preferred testing tools.
  • Easy Test Execution
    Developers can execute tests with a simple right-click, streamlining the test running process and making it more user-friendly.
  • Code Coverage Analysis
    The tool provides code coverage information, helping developers identify untested parts of their codebase and improve test coverage.

Possible disadvantages of TestDriven.NET

  • Cost
    TestDriven.NET is a paid tool, and the licensing cost can be a disadvantage for smaller teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Limited Support for Non-Windows Platforms
    Since TestDriven.NET is primarily designed for Visual Studio, its use is limited to Windows, which can be restrictive for teams using multiple operating systems.
  • Not Updated Frequently
    The tool does not receive updates as frequently as some other testing tools, which can lead to compatibility issues with the latest versions of Visual Studio or testing frameworks.

Visual Assist X features and specs

  • Enhanced Code Navigation
    Visual Assist X provides advanced navigation features like Find References, Go to Implementation, and Open File in Solution, which help developers quickly move through the codebase.
  • Code Refactoring
    The tool offers powerful refactoring options such as Rename, Change Signature, and Extract Method, making code maintenance and enhancement more efficient.
  • Code Correction
    Visual Assist X helps in identifying potential errors and offers code correction suggestions, thereby reducing debugging time.
  • Intuitive Code Suggestions
    The extension provides smarter code suggestions and completions beyond the default IntelliSense, aiding in faster coding.
  • Enhanced Syntax Highlighting
    It offers additional syntax highlighting features, making the code easier to read and understand.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Visual Assist X extends its functionalities to multiple programming languages like C++, C#, and Visual Basic, offering a versatile tool for developers working in different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Visual Assist X

  • Performance Overhead
    Some users may experience performance slowdowns, especially when working with very large solutions, due to the extra processing required by the extension.
  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, the tool introduces a variety of new functionalities that may require time to learn and effectively utilize, particularly for new users.
  • Cost
    Visual Assist X is a paid tool which might not fit the budget of some individual developers or small teams, especially when there are free alternatives available.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users report occasional crashes or stability issues when integrating Visual Assist X with certain versions of Visual Studio.
  • Feature Overlap
    Many features in Visual Assist X overlap with those in newer versions of Visual Studio, which might reduce the tool’s perceived value for those using the latest IDE versions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TestDriven.NET and Visual Assist X)
Code Analysis
17 17%
83% 83
Code Review
25 25%
75% 75
Code Coverage
18 18%
82% 82
Code Quality
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using TestDriven.NET and Visual Assist X. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TestDriven.NET and Visual Assist X, you can also consider the following products

CodeRush - DevExpress CodeRush for Roslyn uses significantly less memory, works faster, and lets you start Visual Studio faster.

ReSharper - ReSharper is a productivity tool for visual studio that provides tools and features to help you manage your code.

ReSharper C++ - ReSharper provides on-the-fly code analysis and eliminates errors in C#, VB.NET, XAML, ASP.NET, and XML

Productivity Power Tools - Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

NDepend - NDepend is a Visual Studio tool to manage complex .NET code and achieve high code quality.