I’m a writer and editor with an interest in content strategy and a technical bent. I am especially good at pulling together the threads of tech history (which you may have seen on my newsletter Tedium, which periodically shows up on HN) but also have two decades of work history in marketing and journalism. As a freelancer, I’ve written many popular stories for Vice’s Motherboard and just published a story in Fast... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Newsletter author here. I run two actually—Tedium (https://tedium.co/) and MidRange (https://midrange.tedium.co). Yes, they work. Beyond the ROI benefits already mentioned by other folks, it’s seen as an “owned” platform, something that you control, versus social media, where the platform is operated by someone else. You can make changes and adapt more efficiently to subscriber needs than somewhere like social... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

I have been using Craft to run my newsletter, Tedium (https://tedium.co), since the start of 2019. I moved from Ghost, which at the time was not really designed for newsletters at all. I find Craft an amazing tool when I want to add new things—a big difference from Ghost, where everything is just kind of set for you and you have to rely on external integrations to expand functionality. I custom-code my emails and... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Https://tedium.co A newsletter that also has a website attached. I set up the backend so it spits out full code for a newsletter in a specific backend view. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

I run Craft CMS for Tedium (https://tedium.co). I could push it further but one way I use it is by creating a custom view that “spits” out a completed email template with all of my desired layout considerations and quirks already considered. I could push it further and run the newsletter through Craft itself, though I’ve chosen to pay someone to manage the sending of the email. (And while not particularly... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

There is a google docs form to fill out at the top of the ethos.io page ( I don't want to direct link it, not sure if it has identifiers in the URL?). Source: over 1 year ago

I hate pushing my opinion on folks (because I really do respect folks who want to be fully done and they're completely valid) but I really do think there should be at least some consideration to the waves or ethos.io proposals (or more due diligence since it seemed like Binance and a few other companies were involved). If FTX truly is the best deal fine, but I do think equity and our crypto being given back... Source: over 1 year ago

4) Voyager took multiple years to switch simple systems and was called out by ethos.io and former board director https://twitter.com/shingolavine/status/1574472263247634432. Source: over 1 year ago

Shingo Lavine who's company Ethos.io (that was acquired by Voyager) made a statement on this as well: https://twitter.com/shingolavine/status/1573030726139727872 stating that that app remake and sharing revenue plan might work well with their Ethos.io plan / proposal here: https://cases.stretto.com/public/x193/11753/PLEADINGS/1175307292280000000006.pdf. Source: over 1 year ago

And that ethos.io was not rebranded into VOyager. Voyager bought Ethos....2 very different scenarios. Source: over 2 years ago