Software Alternatives & Reviews

TeamCity VS Test Kitchen

Compare TeamCity VS Test Kitchen and see what are their differences

TeamCity logo TeamCity

TeamCity is an ultimate Continuous Integration tool for professionals

Test Kitchen logo Test Kitchen

Integration tool for developing and testing infrastructure code and software on isolated target platforms
  • TeamCity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06
  • Test Kitchen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-09

TeamCity videos

CI/CD using Teamcity - Step by Step tutorial 1

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with TeamCity
  • Review - Getting Started with TeamCity EP 5: TeamCity for developers

Test Kitchen videos

No Test Kitchen videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TeamCity and Test Kitchen)
Continuous Integration
DevOps Tools
93 93%
7% 7
Continuous Deployment
93 93%
7% 7
Continuous Integration And Delivery

User comments

Share your experience with using TeamCity and Test Kitchen. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare TeamCity and Test Kitchen

TeamCity Reviews

35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
TeamCity was developed by Jetbrains as an affordable CI/CD solution for software engineering teams and individuals. It is available as a software-based self-hosted on-premise solution or via a managed cloud service.
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
TeamCity is also known as the “Intelligent CI Server” because of its ease of use and integration. It offers different installation packages for different operating systems. It is a powerful tool developed from JetBrains, which allows building, and running tests even before changes are committed, hence keeping the code clean.

Test Kitchen Reviews

We have no reviews of Test Kitchen yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Test Kitchen seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TeamCity mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TeamCity yet. Tracking of TeamCity recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Test Kitchen mentions (4)

  • Chef converge failing
    Part of the SDLC for chef code is to create integration tests with Test Kitchen so you can hack on your chef code for repeatable, idempotent converges. Source: 11 months ago
  • Best lab environment for practicing Ansible / automation?
    Man, I feel like I’m in a weird spot where I love kitchen.ci but no one else has ever heard of it. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Ansible Molecule equivalent for Salt?
    That’s because kitchen is a chef sponsored product https://kitchen.ci. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Chef Solo - Vagrant Provision - Vagrant could not detect Chef on the guest!
    If you're testing cookbooks with Vagrant, then removing the machine straight after, you're better off using Test Kitchen. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TeamCity and Test Kitchen, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

SaltStack - SaltStack event-driven automation delivers security, cloud and configuration management for a software-defined world and enterprise complexity and scale.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Helios - Docker container orchestration platform, by Spotify

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.