Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Tarantool VS Apache Ignite

Compare Tarantool VS Apache Ignite and see what are their differences

Tarantool logo Tarantool

A NoSQL database running in a Lua application server.

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...
  • Tarantool Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08

Tarantool features and specs

  • High Performance
    Tarantool is renowned for its high-speed transactions and low-latency response times, making it suitable for applications that require fast data processing.
  • In-Memory Storage
    Utilizes an in-memory architecture, which enhances data retrieval speeds, beneficial for real-time applications and caching solutions.
  • Lua Integration
    Provides seamless integration with Lua scripting, allowing developers to easily write stored procedures and embed logic directly with the data layer.
  • Scalability
    Offers features like asynchronous replication and sharding, enabling horizontal scaling for large-scale applications.
  • Flexible Schema
    Supports schema-less design, giving developers the flexibility to handle data without strict schemas, making it versatile for evolving data models.

Possible disadvantages of Tarantool

  • Limited Community Support
    Being a less mainstream technology compared to other databases, it has a smaller community, which might mean less third-party resources and community-driven support.
  • Complexity
    Its powerful features can add complexity, making it potentially challenging for developers unfamiliar with in-memory databases and advanced configurations.
  • Fewer Integrations
    Compared to more popular databases, Tarantool may have fewer out-of-the-box integrations with third-party applications and services.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires understanding of Lua scripting and its architecture, which might pose a learning hurdle for developers accustomed to more conventional databases.
  • Limited Documented Use Cases
    There is a relative scarcity of documented use cases and real-world applications, which could be a drawback for companies looking for proven and documented success stories.

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

Tarantool videos

5. СУБД в HighLoad. Tarantool | Технострим

More videos:

  • Review - Поговорим про Tarantool.io, что это такое и как живёт
  • Review - Принципы и приёмы обработки очередей / Константин Осипов (tarantool.org)

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tarantool and Apache Ignite)
Databases
26 26%
74% 74
NoSQL Databases
29 29%
71% 71
Key-Value Database
32 32%
68% 68
Relational Databases
37 37%
63% 63

User comments

Share your experience with using Tarantool and Apache Ignite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ignite seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tarantool mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Tarantool yet. Tracking of Tarantool recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tarantool and Apache Ignite, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

KeyDB - KeyDB is fast NoSQL database with full compatibility for Redis APIs, clients, and modules.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

Hazelcast - Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java