Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hazelcast VS Tarantool

Compare Hazelcast VS Tarantool and see what are their differences

Hazelcast logo Hazelcast

Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java

Tarantool logo Tarantool

A NoSQL database running in a Lua application server.
  • Hazelcast Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05
  • Tarantool Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27

Hazelcast features and specs

  • Scalability
    Hazelcast is designed to scale out horizontally with ease by adding more nodes to the cluster, providing better performance and reliability in distributed environments.
  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Hazelcast stores data in-memory, allowing for extremely fast data access and processing times, which is ideal for applications requiring low latency.
  • High Availability
    Hazelcast offers built-in high availability with its data replication and partitioning features, ensuring data is not lost and the system remains operational during node failures.
  • Ease of Use
    Hazelcast provides a simple and intuitive API, making it accessible to developers and quick to integrate with existing applications.
  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Hazelcast offers a wide range of features including caching, messaging, and distributed computing, all in one platform, which simplifies the architecture by reducing the need for multiple tools.

Possible disadvantages of Hazelcast

  • Memory Usage
    Since Hazelcast operates in-memory, it can consume significant amounts of memory, which may be a concern for applications with large datasets.
  • Complexity in Large Deployments
    While Hazelcast offers scalability, managing and configuring a large-scale deployment can become complex and may require experienced personnel.
  • License Cost
    The enterprise version of Hazelcast, which offers additional features and support, comes with a licensing cost that might not fit all budgets.
  • Limited Language Support
    Hazelcast's strongest support is for Java. While it offers clients for other languages, they may not be as robust or feature-complete as the Java client.
  • Network Latency
    In distributed environments, network latency can impact performance, and as Hazelcast relies on network communication for node interactions, this could be a concern in some scenarios.

Tarantool features and specs

  • High Performance
    Tarantool is renowned for its high-speed transactions and low-latency response times, making it suitable for applications that require fast data processing.
  • In-Memory Storage
    Utilizes an in-memory architecture, which enhances data retrieval speeds, beneficial for real-time applications and caching solutions.
  • Lua Integration
    Provides seamless integration with Lua scripting, allowing developers to easily write stored procedures and embed logic directly with the data layer.
  • Scalability
    Offers features like asynchronous replication and sharding, enabling horizontal scaling for large-scale applications.
  • Flexible Schema
    Supports schema-less design, giving developers the flexibility to handle data without strict schemas, making it versatile for evolving data models.

Possible disadvantages of Tarantool

  • Limited Community Support
    Being a less mainstream technology compared to other databases, it has a smaller community, which might mean less third-party resources and community-driven support.
  • Complexity
    Its powerful features can add complexity, making it potentially challenging for developers unfamiliar with in-memory databases and advanced configurations.
  • Fewer Integrations
    Compared to more popular databases, Tarantool may have fewer out-of-the-box integrations with third-party applications and services.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires understanding of Lua scripting and its architecture, which might pose a learning hurdle for developers accustomed to more conventional databases.
  • Limited Documented Use Cases
    There is a relative scarcity of documented use cases and real-world applications, which could be a drawback for companies looking for proven and documented success stories.

Hazelcast videos

Hazelcast Introduction and cluster demo

More videos:

  • Review - Comparing and Benchmarking Data Grids Apache Ignite vs Hazelcast
  • Demo - Hazelcast Cloud Enterprise - Getting Started Demo Video

Tarantool videos

5. СУБД в HighLoad. Tarantool | Технострим

More videos:

  • Review - Поговорим про Tarantool.io, что это такое и как живёт
  • Review - Принципы и приёмы обработки очередей / Константин Осипов (tarantool.org)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hazelcast and Tarantool)
Databases
65 65%
35% 35
NoSQL Databases
64 64%
36% 36
Key-Value Database
57 57%
43% 43
Relational Databases
58 58%
42% 42

User comments

Share your experience with using Hazelcast and Tarantool. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hazelcast and Tarantool

Hazelcast Reviews

HazelCast - Redis Replacement
Hazelcast IMDG provides a Discovery Service Provider Interface (SPI), which allows users to implement custom member discovery mechanisms to deploy Hazelcast IMDG on any platform. Hazelcast® Discovery SPI also allows you to use third-party software like Zookeeper, Eureka, Consul, etcd for implementing custom discovery mechanism.
Source: hazelcast.org

Tarantool Reviews

We have no reviews of Tarantool yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hazelcast and Tarantool, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Apache Ignite - high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

KeyDB - KeyDB is fast NoSQL database with full compatibility for Redis APIs, clients, and modules.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.