Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Tangar VS Puck.js

Compare Tangar VS Puck.js and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Tangar logo Tangar

Indoor navigation using area learning

Puck.js logo Puck.js

The ground-breaking bluetooth beacon
  • Tangar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-26
  • Puck.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-23

Tangar features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Puck.js features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Puck.js is designed to be beginner-friendly with extensive documentation and examples, making it accessible for those new to IoT projects.
  • JavaScript Programming
    It uses JavaScript, allowing web developers to quickly adapt to hardware programming since they can use a familiar language.
  • Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
    Supports BLE, enabling wireless communication with other devices like smartphones and tablets, useful for IoT applications.
  • Open Source
    Puck.js is open-source, encouraging community involvement and transparency in development.
  • Built-in Sensors
    Includes multiple sensors such as temperature, light, and magnetometer, which extends its capability without additional components.
  • Battery-operated
    Powered by a coin cell battery, providing a portable and wire-free experience ideal for testing and deployment in various environments.

Possible disadvantages of Puck.js

  • Limited Processing Power
    The microcontroller has limited processing power, which might not be suitable for very complex computations or applications.
  • Range Limitations
    BLE range can be limited, affecting communication capabilities over longer distances, especially in obstruction-laden environments.
  • No Direct Internet Connectivity
    Lacks built-in Wi-Fi, requiring additional components or gateways to connect directly to the internet.
  • Power Constraints
    Relies on a small coin cell battery which may need frequent replacements depending on usage, potentially increasing maintenance.
  • Peripheral Support
    Support for additional hardware peripherals may be limited compared to more extensive development boards, potentially restricting expandability.

Tangar videos

No Tangar videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Puck.js videos

+ Add

Puck.js specs | Just Board

More videos:

  • Review - DIY Hands-free music control with Puck.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tangar and Puck.js)

Tangar

Puck.js

Maps
42 42%
Maps
58% 58
Developer Tools
37 37%
Developer Tools
63% 63
Localization
50 50%
Localization
50% 50
App Localization
100 100%
App Localization
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Tangar and Puck.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tangar and Puck.js, you can also consider the following products

Inpixon - Inpixon is on a mission to do good with indoor data. Our Indoor Intelligence™ platform and patented technologies empower users to harness the power of indoor data to create actionable intelligence.

Mapwize - A user-friendly indoor mapping platform

Tranzlate - Localization made easier.

kepler.gl - Uber's geospatial analysis tool for large-scale data sets

Tolgee - We are saving developers time providing tool for Web application Localization

Enso Locate - Indoor location made easy. Beacons + cross-platform SDK.

Loading...