I use it in all my current projects. It's easy to start and very customisable. Love it so much! I improved the speed of development 2x times by using Tailwind.
Based on our record, Tailwind CSS seems to be a lot more popular than Pelican. While we know about 885 links to Tailwind CSS, we've tracked only 25 mentions of Pelican. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
These components are crafted with Tailwind CSS and Material Tailwind, and the best part is—they're totally free and open-source! - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
In my previous post, introducing the Rocketicons, a powerful icon library designed to be used with Tailwind, I expressed my love for the framework, how amazing I think it is, and encouraged its use. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
First of, I got to point out, I love Next.js. It's my go to framework whenever I start a new web project, no other JS framework allows you to build something beautiful that quickly. But quickly is exactly the issue. If you want to build something quickly it's going to come with some trade offs. If you are working with Next.js, when starting a project you'll probably start with some boilerplate or a template, seems... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
First of all, as the codebase was quite old and as I didn't want to bring more tech than what was required, I started to migrate my few React components on Gatsby from StyledComponent (a great CSS-in-JS solution) to Tailwind CSS. Mostly because I wanted to see if I could measure the impact of moving from CSS-in-JS to pure CSS. The second goal was to allow Astro to run without client-side JS. To do so, I either... - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
With Tailwind CSS, you can create unique designs without ever leaving your HTML thanks to its utility-first CSS framework, which offers low-level utility classes. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
Most static site generators will work to create a blog. I use pelican [1], which serves my needs. You will likely need to edit your blogposts a little bit before putting them in the book. So I recommend a separate program for that altogether. [1] https://getpelican.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
In my experience, [Pelican](https://getpelican.com/) does a good job of allowing you to edit themes on all pages at once with its static page generator. There are a lot of built in features designed more for blog-like websites, but I’ve found it pretty easy to make my personal website with it. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
There's also Pelican but I haven't used it and seeing as Github serves static pages I'd imagine it builds and deploys your page and is done with it. Source: about 1 year ago
I use Pelican (https://getpelican.com/) for my blog, which works decently for me. It is a static site generator written in Python. But you probably won't learn much Python by using it (or Rust when using a generator written in it) since you probably won't need to change anything in it. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Surely a "local private wiki ... Not web based ... On a desktop application" is not really a "wiki" at all, but rather a "static site generator" with a built-in "search". If that's what you want, there's a Python app called Pelican. Writing such an app from scratch isn't really a beginners project. Source: over 1 year ago
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Bulma - Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React