Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Syncfusion VS Blazor

Compare Syncfusion VS Blazor and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Syncfusion logo Syncfusion

The world's best UI component suite for building powerful web, desktop, and mobile apps

Blazor logo Blazor

An experimental web UI framework using C#/Razor and HTML, running in the browser via WebAssembly
  • Syncfusion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Syncfusion understands the challenges facing software developers and business teams. Between ensuring deadlines are met, managing project requirements, and testing and debugging your applications, time is your most important resource, and it seems like you never have enough of it. That’s where we come in.

Syncfusion provides an ecosystem of compatible developer control suites, embeddable BI platforms, and business software. Our 1,800+ components and frameworks for mobile, web, and desktop development get your products to market faster, and our Bold line delivers a diverse set of enterprise solutions, ranging from data analysis and visualization, to help desk software, to an electronic signature platform. With endless customization options, you can deliver an optimal user experience while saving development time and cost.

We are proud to serve a wide variety of customers, from individual developers to Fortune 100 companies. No matter your needs or your budget, we have the tools to help your team succeed.

  • Blazor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Syncfusion

$ Details
freemium $395.0 / Monthly (A team of up to 5 developers*)
Platforms
JavaScript ASP.NET MVC Flutter Vue ReactJS Angular

Blazor

Website
blazor.net
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-

Syncfusion features and specs

  • Wide Range of Components
    Syncfusion offers a comprehensive suite of UI controls and frameworks for a range of platforms including web, desktop, and mobile applications, making it a versatile choice for developers.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The components are loaded with features, which can save developers time as they do not need to build functionalities from scratch.
  • Excellent Documentation
    Syncfusion provides extensive documentation and examples, which are helpful for developers to quickly implement and troubleshoot components.
  • Good Customer Support
    The company offers responsive customer support, which is advantageous for resolving issues encountered during development.
  • Regular Updates
    Syncfusion regularly updates its components with new features, improvements, and bug fixes, thereby enhancing product quality over time.
  • Cost-effectiveness
    Their pricing model, including the option of a community license for smaller teams or personal use, can be cost-effective for many users.

Blazor features and specs

  • Single Language
    Blazor allows developers to use C# for both client-side and server-side development, reducing the need to switch between different languages and enhancing developer productivity.
  • Full-Stack Development
    With Blazor, developers can build full-stack web applications using .NET, leveraging the vast .NET ecosystem and tools.
  • WebAssembly Support
    Blazor WebAssembly enables running C# code directly in the browser, allowing for rich interactive web applications with less reliance on JavaScript.
  • Reusability
    Blazor promotes code reusability by allowing shared code between server and client-side applications.
  • Components-Based Architecture
    It uses a component-based architecture that facilitates easier maintenance of code and enhances modularity.

Possible disadvantages of Blazor

  • Performance Limits
    Blazor WebAssembly can have slower performance compared to JavaScript due to its intermediated execution through WebAssembly.
  • Download Size
    Blazor WebAssembly applications can have larger initial download sizes, which can affect load times and user experience.
  • Newness
    As a relatively new technology, the Blazor community is still growing, which can sometimes limit the availability of third-party tools and resources.
  • Limited Browser Support
    Some older browsers do not support WebAssembly, potentially reducing the reach of Blazor applications if not accounted for.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers familiar with JavaScript frameworks may encounter a learning curve when transitioning to Blazor and the .NET ecosystem.

Syncfusion videos

Syncfusion

More videos:

  • Review - what Blazor component to choose? component comparison MudBlazor vs Syncfusion vs MatBlazor vs Radzen
  • Review - Syncfusion Essential Studio and UI Kit for Xamarin & Xamarin.Forms

Blazor videos

Is Blazor A JavaScript Killer?

More videos:

  • Review - Blazor vs JavaScript frameworks
  • Review - Blazor server-side vs client-side (WebAssembly) | What should you choose?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Syncfusion and Blazor)
Prototyping
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
43 43%
57% 57

User comments

Share your experience with using Syncfusion and Blazor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Syncfusion and Blazor

Syncfusion Reviews

We have no reviews of Syncfusion yet.
Be the first one to post

Blazor Reviews

Exploring 15 Powerful Flutter Alternatives
One advantage Blazor introduces comes around security-sensitive use cases. With .NET powering backend, client, and shared application logic, Blazor simplifies applying consistent security principles systemwide. The robust .NET encryption libraries integrate cleanly to protect network and device data. Single unified user authentication flows minimize risk exposure through...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Blazor should be more popular than Syncfusion. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Syncfusion mentions (1)

Blazor mentions (7)

  • Blazor and .NET 8: How I Built a Fast and Flexible Website
    I’ve been working on a new website for my series CSharp in the Cards. I built this website in a way that was easy to maintain, flexible and most importantly would respond quickly to requests from visitors. I knew that Blazor with .NET 8 had a static server rendering feature and decided that I wanted to put it to the test. I recently published a new lesson to the website and included a web assembly component to... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • #12: Headless CMS & SWA - Built With Blazor
    Over the last few days we've been exploring JavaScript-based frameworks for building web apps. Today, we switch our attention to our amazing .NET community and talk about building Static Web Apps with Blazor. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • What is a good reason to consider Blazor?
    Hi there. I'm the Program Manager at Microsoft for Blazor, so naturally I'm happy to make the Blazor pitch 😊. If you're comfortable already with JS/TS then it's understandable that Blazor might not have as strong an appeal. Blazor is all about enabling full stack web development with just .NET & C# without having to write JavaScript. But even if you are a JS/TS fan, it's still very convenient to operate fully... Source: over 3 years ago
  • My Favorite C# Features - Part 5: Build for the Modern Web with Blazor
    Building web applications with Blazor is a great way for developers who enjoy C# and .NET to create interactive web applications. I encourage you to check out the Blazor 101 video series published on YouTube and check out https://blazor.net for more learning materials and the tools to get started with Blazor. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • What to Expect in .NET 6
    Blazor has become a smart way to build .NET web applications. This is because of its seamlessness and ease of integration with UI libraries like ComponentOne. This makes the application development life cycle more efficient. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Syncfusion and Blazor, you can also consider the following products

Telerik - UI Frameworks and App Development Tools

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

MockFlow - A super easy wireframing tool with all the other tools you need in the product design process

Retool - Build custom internal tools in minutes.

Axure - The most powerful way to plan, prototype and hand off to developers, all without code. Download a free trial and see why professionals choose Axure RP 9.

Microsoft PowerApps - Microsoft PowerApps provides tools to create, customize, share and run apps.