Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SymbSearch VS Onboard on-screen keyboard

Compare SymbSearch VS Onboard on-screen keyboard and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

SymbSearch logo SymbSearch

A tool for searching unicode-symbols and copying it to the clipboard.

Onboard on-screen keyboard logo Onboard on-screen keyboard

An onscreen keyboard useful for tablet PC users and for mobility impaired users.
  • SymbSearch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-25
  • Onboard on-screen keyboard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

SymbSearch features and specs

  • Efficiency
    SymbSearch offers efficient searching capabilities by utilizing symbolic search techniques that optimize the retrieval of information.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The website provides a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and use its features.
  • Advanced Search Features
    SymbSearch includes advanced search functionalities like filtering and sorting, which enhance the user experience by delivering more relevant results.
  • Innovative Approach
    By integrating symbolic search methodologies, SymbSearch stands out with its innovative approach to solving common search problems.

Possible disadvantages of SymbSearch

  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with symbolic search methods may experience a learning curve while adapting to the system's functionalities.
  • Limited Use Cases
    The specificity of symbolic search may limit its application to certain areas or industries where such techniques are most beneficial.
  • Technical Complexity
    The underlying complexity of symbolic search operations might necessitate more robust technical support for optimal use.
  • Dependency on Data Structure
    The effectiveness of SymbSearch can heavily depend on the structure and quality of the data used, potentially impacting performance.

Onboard on-screen keyboard features and specs

  • Accessibility
    Onboard provides an essential accessibility feature for users with physical disabilities, allowing them to input text without a physical keyboard.
  • Customizability
    The on-screen keyboard offers a high degree of customizability with options to change layout, size, theme, and key labels to suit different user preferences.
  • Integration
    Onboard integrates well with the Ubuntu desktop environment and other distributions, ensuring smooth usage alongside other system tools.
  • Ease of Use
    It is designed to be user-friendly, with intuitive settings and simple instructions, making it easy for non-technical users to operate.
  • Predictive Text
    Includes a predictive text feature that suggests words as you type, improving typing efficiency and speed.

Possible disadvantages of Onboard on-screen keyboard

  • Resource Usage
    Due to its graphical nature, Onboard can consume more system resources than a physical keyboard, which may affect performance on older or less powerful machines.
  • Screen Space
    Taking up part of the screen can be inconvenient, especially on smaller displays, reducing the available space for other applications.
  • Limited Features Compared to Physical Keyboards
    While Onboard offers basic keyboard functionality, it lacks some features and tactile feedback that physical keyboards offer, potentially hampering prolonged use.
  • Dependency on Pointer Device
    Relying heavily on mouse or touchpad input can be a limitation for users with difficulties using these devices, potentially necessitating additional accessibility tools.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    While generally well-integrated with Ubuntu, there might be occasional compatibility issues with other software, especially non-mainstream applications.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SymbSearch and Onboard on-screen keyboard)
Fonts
83 83%
17% 17
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
Character Maps
100 100%
0% 0
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SymbSearch and Onboard on-screen keyboard. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Onboard on-screen keyboard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SymbSearch mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SymbSearch yet. Tracking of SymbSearch recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Onboard on-screen keyboard mentions (4)

  • Korean (Hangul) on-screen virtual keyboard for Linux.
    With the archaic xvkbd, layout switcher didn't work for me. I also found some custom layouts for onboard, but was unable to download/use them. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Steam Deck - Steam Deck Client Update: Notifications and Input fixes - Steam News
    Https://launchpad.net/onboard is exclusively what I use in desktop mode. Pinned it to my favorites. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Onboard virtual keyboard switches layout while writing
    Report the bug here https://launchpad.net/onboard. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Challenge: Use KDE Plasma ONLY With Touchscreen
    Do you mean this one: https://launchpad.net/onboard? What do you like more about it in comparison to Maliit? Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SymbSearch and Onboard on-screen keyboard, you can also consider the following products

WinCompose - WinCompose supports the standard Compose file format.

Florence Virtual Keyboard - Florence is an extensible scalable virtual keyboard for GNOME.

BabelMap - Unicode Character Map for Windows

AnySoftKeyboard - Android (f/w 1.5+) on-screen keyboard for multiple languages.

PopChar - It has never been easier to find and insert special characters.

Free Virtual Keyboard - Free Virtual Keyboard is a free, lightweight, multilingual and finger friendly virtual keyboard.