Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Swift VS OCaml

Compare Swift VS OCaml and see what are their differences

Swift logo Swift

Swift is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm, compiled programming language developed by Apple Inc. for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, Linux and z/OS.

OCaml logo OCaml

(* Binary tree with leaves carrying an integer.
  • Swift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

We recommend LibHunt Swift for discovery and comparisons of trending Swift projects.

  • OCaml Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

We recommend LibHunt OCaml for discovery and comparisons of trending OCaml projects.

Swift features and specs

  • Performance
    Swift is designed to be high-performance, often running faster than Objective-C due to its modern language constructs and optimized LLVM compiler.
  • Safety
    Swift includes features like optionals, type inference, and safe memory management to reduce common programming errors and crashes.
  • Readability
    Swift's syntax is clean and less cluttered, making it easier to read and maintain.
  • Interoperability
    Swift is fully interoperable with Objective-C, allowing for easy integration with existing iOS and macOS projects.
  • Modern language features
    Swift includes modern programming concepts such as closures, generics, and tuples which can help developers write expressive and efficient code.
  • Memory management
    Swift uses Automatic Reference Counting (ARC), which helps in efficient memory management without requiring manual intervention from the developer.
  • Active community and support
    Swift has a large, active community and strong support from Apple, ensuring continuous evolution and community-driven improvements.

Possible disadvantages of Swift

  • Newness
    Being relatively new compared to languages like Objective-C, Swift is still evolving, which might lead to occasional stability issues or breaking changes with new updates.
  • Limited legacy support
    Swift does not work with versions of iOS and macOS older than iOS 7 and OS X 10.9, limiting its use in maintaining really old applications.
  • Learning curve
    For developers accustomed to Objective-C or other languages, there is a learning curve associated with familiarizing themselves with Swift’s new syntax and features.
  • Smaller pool of third-party libraries
    Although growing, the ecosystem of third-party libraries for Swift is still smaller compared to more mature languages, potentially limiting immediate availability of tools.
  • Binary compatibility
    Binary compatibility issues can arise, especially when working with a mixed codebase of Swift and Objective-C, requiring extra caution during implementation.
  • Tooling maturity
    Some of the development tools and environments, while robust, can still be less mature compared to the well-established Objective-C tooling.

OCaml features and specs

  • Strong Type System
    OCaml's type system is robust and supports type inference, which helps catch errors at compile time and increases code maintainability.
  • Functional Programming Features
    OCaml provides strong support for functional programming paradigms, which can lead to more concise and expressive code.
  • Performance
    OCaml compiles to native code, making it suitable for performance-critical applications while retaining the high-level language benefits.
  • Interactive Top-Level
    OCaml provides an interactive top-level or REPL (Read-Evaluate-Print Loop), useful for quickly testing code snippets and prototyping.
  • Pattern Matching
    OCaml's pattern matching is powerful and expressive, allowing for cleaner and more readable code when dealing with complex data structures.

Possible disadvantages of OCaml

  • Steep Learning Curve
    OCaml can be challenging to learn for developers unfamiliar with functional programming or type inference systems.
  • Limited Libraries
    Compared to more popular languages, OCaml has a smaller ecosystem of libraries and tools, which might limit its applicability in some domains.
  • Documentation
    The documentation for OCaml and its libraries can be sparse or insufficient, which can be a barrier for new users.
  • Verbose Syntax
    OCaml syntax can be verbose and may require more boilerplate code compared to some other functional languages.
  • Lack of Parallelism Support
    OCaml's support for parallelism and concurrency is limited compared to some other languages, which could be a disadvantage for highly concurrent applications.

Swift videos

Honest Review of Swift and First Year Pay

More videos:

  • Review - Maruti Suzuki Swift - Hindi Review - Autoportal
  • Review - 2018 Maruti Swift Review - Still Fun To Drive | Faisal Khan

OCaml videos

Uncommon Languages: OCaml

More videos:

  • Review - What is Ocaml?
  • Review - OCaml – The Best Coding Language for Blockchain – Dr. Dray at Tezos LA

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Swift and OCaml)
Programming Language
49 49%
51% 51
OOP
31 31%
69% 69
Programming
100 100%
0% 0
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Swift and OCaml. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Swift and OCaml

Swift Reviews

Top 10 Rust Alternatives
Swift also stands to be among the general-purpose computer languages used to generate codes. The basics of this language are based on a safer approach for the users.
The 10 Best Programming Languages to Learn Today
With the growing popularity of Apple operating systems and applications, having Swift programming skills under your belt is a wise investment. Swift shares some similar characteristics with programming languages Ruby and Python.
Source: ict.gov.ge

OCaml Reviews

We have no reviews of OCaml yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

OCaml might be a bit more popular than Swift. We know about 32 links to it since March 2021 and only 30 links to Swift. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Swift mentions (30)

  • Migrating Away from Rust
    It surely is, according to Apple's own documentation. > Swift is a successor to the C, C++, and Objective-C languages. It includes low-level primitives such as types, flow control, and operators. It also provides object-oriented features such as classes, protocols, and generics. -- https://developer.apple.com/swift/ If developers have such a big problem glueing C libraries into Java JNI, or Panama, then maybe game... - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago
  • Apple's Darwin OS and XNU Kernel Deep Dive
    Yes, Apple themselves, apparently folks wanting Apple to use Rust don't read Apple's documentation or watch talks done by Apple compiler developers. > Swift was designed from the outset to be safer than C-based languages, and eliminates entire classes of unsafe code. -- https://www.swift.org/about/ > Swift is a successor to the C, C++, and Objective-C languages. It includes low-level primitives such as types, flow... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • The Top Programming Languages to Learn in 2024
    Swift is Apple's programming language for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS app development. It's known for its performance and safety, making it a great choice for developing apps in the Apple ecosystem. Explore Swift here. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Swift was always going to be part of the OS
    The raisons d'être between the CLR (and C#) and Swift are entirely different. Apple has explicitly set out to adopt swift as a successor language to C, Objective-C, C++, and Objective-C++[0][1]. This stands in stark contrast to Microsoft's vision for the CLR, which was… to be a better Java, more or less? (Does anyone actually know what the .NET initiative was all about? Microsoft went absolutely ham on it... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Local Dev Meetup
    What part of the coding universe are you interested in? Swift? React? Fission Ecosystem? Source: over 1 year ago
View more

OCaml mentions (32)

  • TypeScript's Lack of Naming Types and Type Conversion in Angular
    Elm, ReScript, F#, Ocaml, Scala… it’s just normal to name your types, then use them places. In fact, you’ll often create the types _before_ the code, even if you’re not really practicing DDD (Domain Driven Design). Yes, you’ll do many after the fact when doing functions, or you start testing things and decide to change your design, and make new types. Either way, it’s just “the norm”. You then do the other norms... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • ReScript has come a long way, maybe it's time to switch from TypeScript?
    Ocaml is still a wonderful language if you want to look into it, and Reason is still going strong as an alternate syntax for OCaml. With either OCaml or Reason you can compile to native code, or use the continuation of BuckleScript now called Melange. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Bringing more sweetness to ruby with sorbet types 🍦
    If you have been in the Ruby community for the past couple of years, it's possible that you're not a super fan of types or that this concept never passed through your mind, and that's totally cool. I myself love the dynamic and meta-programming nature of Ruby, and honestly, by the time of this article's writing, we aren't on the level of OCaml for type checking and inference, but still, there are a couple of nice... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Notes about the ongoing Perl logo discussion
    An amazing example is Ocaml lang logo / mascot. It might be useful to talk with them to know what was the process behind this work. The About page camel head on Perl dot org header is also a pretty good example of simplification, but it's not a logo, just a friendly illustration, as the O'Reilly camel is. Another notable logo for this animal is the well known tobacco industry company, but don't get me started on... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • What can Category Theory do?
    Haskell and Agda are probably the most obvious examples. Ocaml too, but it is much older, so its type system is not as categorical. There is also Idris, which is not as well-known but is very cool. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Swift and OCaml, you can also consider the following products

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

NIM - GB64.COM is the home of The Gamebase Collection of C64 games.

Perl - Highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over 26 years of development