surge.sh VS sish

Surge.sh — a simple cloud platform for deploying static websites. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago

There's also surge.sh (https://surge.sh) but I'm not sure if they have similar policies as Netlify. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Surge: Static web publishing for front-end developers. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Surge.sh — Static web publishing for Front-End developers. Unlimited sites with custom domain support. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

"Deploy anything in six keystrokes" https://surge.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Sish - Open source ngrok/serveo alternative. SSH-based but uses a custom server written in Go. Supports WebSocket tunneling. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago

Tunneling services can be considered as a solution in some cases. Services like ngrok, frp, localtunnel and sish create a public endpoint that tunnels communication to your local endpoint via a tunnel client. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Why not forget about Cloudflare and a VPN but get a 3 euro Hetzner server and install https://github.com/antoniomika/sish for dynamic DNS through SSH + Traefik with a DNS resolver and have yourself a wildcard certificate. This way you can host any service from home as long as you run a port forwarding service through SSH with a one liner on Ubuntu. Better yet make an alpine docker image with a command to route... Source: over 1 year ago

Personally I’ve been using sish[1] recently, lots of ngrok alternatives out there now, especially as the pricing went a bit weird [1] https://github.com/antoniomika/sish. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I used to use a similar tool called inlets but they removed the open licensing. I now self host a sish server (https://github.com/antoniomika/sish) which also uses ssh for the reverse tunnel client. So much simpler! - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago