Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

surge.sh VS react-testing-library

Compare surge.sh VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to surge.sh and react-testing-library)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using surge.sh and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library should be more popular than surge.sh. It has been mentiond 133 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing surge.sh and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.