Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

surge.sh VS Editor.js

Compare surge.sh VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

craftlands.host
Powerful, fast, and budget-friendly game server hosting for Minecraft, Rust and more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

  • Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

  • Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

  • Developers building applications requiring structured data
  • Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
  • Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
  • Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

surge.sh videos

+ Add

Introducing Surge

Editor.js videos

+ Add

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to surge.sh and Editor.js)

surge.sh

Editor.js

Static Site Generators
100 100%
Static Site Generators
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
Website Builder
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
Rich Text Editor
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using surge.sh and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare surge.sh and Editor.js

surge.sh Reviews

We have no reviews of surge.sh yet.
Be the first one to post

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

Editor.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editor.js yet. Tracking of Editor.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing surge.sh and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Loading...