Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

surge.sh VS CSS Wand

Compare surge.sh VS CSS Wand and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.

CSS Wand logo CSS Wand

Easy copy-paste beautiful CSS animations
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • CSS Wand Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-30

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

CSS Wand features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    CSS Wand offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to quickly find and apply CSS effects without needing extensive coding knowledge.
  • Wide Range of Effects
    The tool provides a variety of pre-built CSS effects and animations, saving time for developers who need quick solutions for common design requirements.
  • Code Readiness
    CSS Wand allows users to copy and paste CSS code snippets directly into their projects, streamlining the design process and enhancing productivity.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, CSS Wand does not require any installation, making it accessible from any device with internet access.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, CSS Wand encourages community contributions and improvements, ensuring the tool can evolve with user needs and receive timely updates.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Wand

  • Limited Customizability
    While CSS Wand offers various pre-set effects, users may find it challenging to customize these effects beyond the provided options.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As a web-based tool, it requires an internet connection to access, which can be a limitation for offline development environments.
  • Performance Considerations
    Applying too many complex effects from CSS Wand could potentially impact website performance if not optimized properly.
  • Niche Use Case
    While useful for quick CSS animations, CSS Wand may not cater to large or complex projects requiring custom animations and interactions.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    New users without familiarity in CSS might need some learning time to understand how to best implement and tweak the effects into their projects.

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

CSS Wand videos

No CSS Wand videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to surge.sh and CSS Wand)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using surge.sh and CSS Wand. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

CSS Wand mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS Wand yet. Tracking of CSS Wand recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing surge.sh and CSS Wand, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Keyframes.app - A timeline editor for CSS animations

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

Animista - Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

CSS Animation Cheat Sheet - Awesome CSS3 plugin for spiffy animations