Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Surge for Mac VS Termshark

Compare Surge for Mac VS Termshark and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Surge for Mac logo Surge for Mac

Advanced Web Debugging Proxy for Mac & iOS

Termshark logo Termshark

A terminal user-interface for tshark, inspired by Wireshark.
  • Surge for Mac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-03
  • Termshark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-10

Surge for Mac features and specs

  • Comprehensive Network Debugging
    Surge for Mac provides advanced network debugging features, including HTTP/HTTPS proxy, capture and analysis of network traffic, and robust filtering options. This makes it easy to diagnose and fix network issues.
  • Rule-based Configuration
    Surge supports complex, rule-based configurations, which are highly customizable. This allows for precise control over network behavior, aiding in development, testing, and deployment scenarios.
  • API Request Analysis
    The tool provides detailed insights into API requests and responses, helping developers and testers to understand and optimize backend API communications.
  • Advanced Proxy Capabilities
    Surge offers robust proxy capabilities, including support for SOCKS5, HTTP CONNECT, and rewrite rules, making it versatile for various network environments and use cases.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Surge boasts a user-friendly interface which simplifies the process of setting up and managing complex network configurations, making it accessible even for users who are not network experts.
  • Automation and Scripting Support
    The platform supports automation and scripting, allowing users to automate repetitive tasks and integrate Surge into their workflows using JavaScript.

Possible disadvantages of Surge for Mac

  • Cost
    Surge for Mac is a paid software, which can be relatively costly compared to some other network debugging tools or open-source alternatives.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its advanced features and capabilities, there can be a steep learning curve for new users. Understanding all of its functions and configurations may require some time and effort.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Surge, particularly with extensive network traffic analysis and debugging features enabled, can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting the overall performance of your Mac.
  • Overwhelming for Simple Use Cases
    For users with simpler needs, the extensive features of Surge may be overwhelming. In such cases, a more straightforward tool might be a better fit.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some users have reported compatibility issues with certain applications and services, which may require troubleshooting or alternative configurations to resolve.

Termshark features and specs

  • Terminal-Based Interface
    Termshark provides a terminal-based user interface, enabling users comfortable with CLI tools to utilize packet analysis without needing a graphical environment.
  • Wireshark Compatibility
    Termshark supports the use of Wireshark’s packet dissection capabilities, which allows for detailed packet analysis similar to what users expect from Wireshark.
  • Cross-Platform
    The tool is cross-platform, meaning it can run on different operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for different user environments.
  • Resource Efficiency
    As a terminal-based application, Termshark is often more lightweight and can be less resource-intensive than graphical packet analyzers, which is beneficial on systems with limited resources.
  • TShark Backend
    Termshark leverages TShark, the command-line version of Wireshark, for capturing and analyzing packet data, providing robustness and reliability in its analyses.

Possible disadvantages of Termshark

  • Limited Visualizations
    Termshark, being a terminal-based tool, lacks advanced visualizations available in graphical packet analyzers, which may limit its usefulness for users who prefer visual data representation.
  • Learning Curve
    For users unfamiliar with command-line interfaces or packet analysis, Termshark might present a steep learning curve compared to simpler, graphical tools.
  • Dependency on TShark
    Termshark requires TShark to be installed and properly configured, which adds a level of dependency and initial setup complexity for new users.
  • Limited Debugging Features
    Compared to full-fledged graphical tools like Wireshark, Termshark may offer limited debugging and interactive examination features, potentially hindering deep packet investigation.

Analysis of Surge for Mac

Overall verdict

  • Surge for Mac is considered an excellent tool for those who need advanced network management and debugging capabilities. It is particularly well-regarded in the developer community for its reliability and feature-rich platform.

Why this product is good

  • Surge for Mac is praised for its powerful networking tools that cater specifically to developers and IT professionals. It offers a robust suite of functionalities including HTTP/S Proxy, Traffic Monitoring, and Local DNS Mapping, which are highly beneficial for testing and debugging purposes. The user interface is also designed to be intuitive, allowing for efficient management of network configurations.

Recommended for

    Surge is highly recommended for software developers, network administrators, and IT professionals who require comprehensive and reliable tools for network testing, debugging, and configuration management.

Surge for Mac videos

No Surge for Mac videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Termshark videos

Pinephone Mobian (Debian) - Termshark Sniffer Working, Apps, Firefox Tor Setup

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Surge for Mac and Termshark)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Surge for Mac and Termshark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Termshark seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Surge for Mac mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Surge for Mac yet. Tracking of Surge for Mac recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Termshark mentions (6)

  • Show HN: NetSour, CLI Based Wireshark
    I can really recommend https://termshark.io/ It looks basically exactly like the Wireshark UI, but it's a TUI. So if I need some more interactivity than tcpdump, I use termshark instead. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • termshark v2.4: a terminal UI for tshark - with packet search and profiles
    Hello fellow command-line devotees - termshark v2.4 is now available via github. Termshark is a terminal user-interface for tshark that tries to imitate the look and feel of Wireshark. The motivation is for when you're ssh-ed somewhere and want to study some network packets without the hassle of copying them back to your desktop. This release adds Wireshark-like packet search (ctrl-f to open) and profiles, like... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • termshark v2.4: a terminal UI for tshark - now featuring packet search and profiles
    Hello everyone - I made a new release of termshark: version 2.4. Termshark is my attempt at a terminal UI for tshark that shamelessly copies the look and feel of Wireshark. The motivation for termshark is for when you're ssh-ed somewhere, want to look at some packets quickly, but it's a pain to copy pcaps back to your desktop. This version adds a Wireshark-like packet-search (ctrl-f to open) and user profiles -... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • termshark v2.4: a terminal UI for tshark - now featuring packet search and profiles
    Hi everyone - I published termshark v2.4 yesterday on github. Termshark is a terminal UI for tshark that I've tried to make look similar to Wireshark. It's written completely in Go and so compiles down to a single executable for each platform. Github has pre-compiled binaries for Linux, macOS, Windows and the BSDs. The motivation for termshark is for when you have a pcap or a source of packets you want to check... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • termshark v2.3: a TUI for tshark - with configurable columns and magic wormhole!
    Hello command-line colleagues - termshark v2.3 is now up on github. Termshark is a terminal user-interface for tshark that copies the look of Wireshark in 80x32. For this release, I've added configurable columns and a way to transfer the open capture file using magic-wormhole. Termshark can be convenient but for any non-trivial analysis, you need to get the pcap open in Wireshark. If you tend to ssh from within... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Surge for Mac and Termshark, you can also consider the following products

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

Weer - A HTTP protocol debugger with Chrome DevTools frontend interface

PCAPdroid - PCAPdroid is an android app to capture the phone traffic and analyze it remotely (e.g. via Wireshark). The traffic can be easily downloaded from a remote device thanks to the integrated HTTP server, or streamed to a remote UDP receiver.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

tcpdump - tcpdump is a common packet analyzer that runs under the command line.