Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

supastarter VS Node.js on App Engine

Compare supastarter VS Node.js on App Engine and see what are their differences

supastarter logo supastarter

The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.

Node.js on App Engine logo Node.js on App Engine

Fully managed Node.js serverless application platform
  • supastarter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-17
  • Node.js on App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-20

supastarter features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Supastarter provides a streamlined setup process, making it easy for developers to quickly initialize and configure their projects without hassle.
  • Comprehensive Features
    Includes a wide variety of prebuilt features and integrations, allowing developers to implement extensive functionality without starting from scratch.
  • Customizability
    Offers a high level of customization, enabling developers to tailor their projects to meet specific requirements and preferences.
  • Community Support
    Backed by a strong community offering support, plugins, and extensions, providing valuable resources and collaborative opportunities.

Possible disadvantages of supastarter

  • Learning Curve
    While easy to use, new users may face an initial learning curve to fully understand and utilize all the features effectively.
  • Overhead
    The comprehensive nature of Supastarter might introduce additional overhead, which could be unnecessary for simpler projects.
  • Dependency Management
    Reliance on certain libraries or frameworks could lead to dependency management challenges, especially as projects grow in complexity.
  • Update Frequency
    Frequent updates could require developers to spend time on maintenance and compatibility checks, which can be time-consuming.

Node.js on App Engine features and specs

  • Scalability
    App Engine provides automatic scaling, which means your Node.js application can handle increased traffic by scaling up and scales down when the traffic decreases.
  • Fully Managed
    App Engine manages the infrastructure for you, including server configuration and management, allowing developers to focus on code rather than infrastructure.
  • Integrated Google Cloud Services
    Node.js on App Engine can easily integrate with other Google Cloud services like Cloud Datastore, Cloud SQL, and more, fostering rich and scalable application development.
  • Built-in Security Features
    App Engine provides built-in security features to protect your Node.js application including Identity and Access Management (IAM) and integration with Google’s security infrastructure.
  • Cost Efficiency
    The pay-per-use model ensures that you only pay for what you use, which can be cost-effective for applications with variable workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Node.js on App Engine

  • Cold Start Latency
    Like many serverless environments, Node.js applications on App Engine might experience latency due to cold starts, especially after periods of inactivity.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Deploying on App Engine might lead to a certain level of dependency on Google Cloud’s ecosystem, making it challenging to migrate to another cloud provider without significant changes.
  • Limited Customization
    Being a fully managed service, there are limits to how much you can customize the runtime environment compared to traditional server instances.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Understanding App Engine's pricing model can be complex, which could make cost estimation difficult, particularly without a clear forecast of usage patterns.
  • Resource Constraints
    Given that App Engine standard environment has specific resource constraints and quotas, this might not be suitable for applications with high memory or CPU demands.

supastarter videos

Supastarter - The Ultimate Tool For Indie Hackers

More videos:

  • Review - Building Email Marketing Startup - "SupaStarters" Podcast

Node.js on App Engine videos

No Node.js on App Engine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to supastarter and Node.js on App Engine)
Developer Tools
83 83%
17% 17
Boilerplate
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Nextjs
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using supastarter and Node.js on App Engine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, supastarter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

supastarter mentions (12)

  • supastarter and Indie Hacking with Jonathan Wilke
    Want to skip to the Discount code for supastarter: CODINGCATDEV. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Thoughts on Paid Next.js Template/Boilerplate
    To build complex applications, https://supastarter.dev/?aff=zXRYe is currently the best I've used, based on a monorepo, with complete features and clear, robust code. However, the downside is that there are very few components for landing pages, which complements shipfast perfectly, But his price is also the most expensive.. There are also two other good ones: - https://anotherwrapper.com/?aff=zXRYe Build AI... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Thoughts on Paid Next.js Template/Boilerplate
    I bought https://shipfa.st/?via=top during Black Friday, but I'm not particularly satisfied with it because Marc focuses too much on marketing rather than continuously improving Shipfast, and there might not be new features for a month or two. This is more suitable for building landing pages rather than complex applications, as the rich components are basically designed for landing pages. In terms of landing pages... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • SaaS starter kit for Next.js 14
    Hey everyone, I am building a SaaS starter kit for Next.js 14 and would love to hear your feedback! It's a production-ready boilerplate and includes all the common features of a SaaS: 🔐 Authentication 🌏 i18n 💸 Billing 📧 Mails 🪄 AI integration 🧩 Customizable UI 🔗API ... And much more! You can learn more about all the features at https://supastarter.dev/products/starter-kits/nextjs. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Feedback wanted - Next.js 14 SaaS starter kit
    Hey everyone, I am building a SaaS starter kit for Next.js 14 and would love to hear your feedback! It's a production-ready boilerplate and includes all the common features of a SaaS: 🔐 Authentication 🌏 i18n 💸 Billing 📧 Mails 🪄 AI integration 🧩 Customizable UI 🔗API ...and much more! Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Node.js on App Engine mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Node.js on App Engine yet. Tracking of Node.js on App Engine recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing supastarter and Node.js on App Engine, you can also consider the following products

NextBase - Built your SAAS quickly and skip the boring parts

Serverless - Toolkit for building serverless applications

ShipFa.st - The NextJS boilerplate with all the stuff you need to get your product in front of customers. From idea to production in 5 minutes.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Shipped.club - Launch your product within hours. And make money. Save 60+ hours and $1000+.

Webiny - The Enterprise CMS platform that you can host on your cloud