Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Subtitle Editor VS Tesseract

Compare Subtitle Editor VS Tesseract and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
This page does not exist
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Subtitle Editor logo Subtitle Editor

Subtitle Editor is a GTK+3 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD.

Tesseract logo Tesseract

Tesseract is an optical character recognition engine for various operating systems
  • Subtitle Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-29
  • Tesseract Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21

Subtitle Editor features and specs

  • Open Source
    Subtitle Editor is open source, which means it is free to use and allows users to contribute to its development and improvement.
  • Wide Format Support
    The tool supports a variety of subtitle formats, making it versatile for different types of subtitle editing projects.
  • Advanced Editing Features
    Subtitle Editor offers a range of advanced editing features, such as waveform and spectrogram views, to aid in precise subtitle timing and syncing.
  • Multiplatform
    Designed for Linux, it also runs on other Unix-like systems, offering flexibility across different operating environments.

Possible disadvantages of Subtitle Editor

  • Limited OS Support
    Primarily developed for Linux, it may face compatibility issues or lack support on Windows and macOS platforms.
  • Complex Interface
    The interface can be daunting for beginners due to its range of advanced features and configurations, resulting in a steeper learning curve.
  • Dependency Requirements
    Installation may require additional dependencies that are not bundled with the software, potentially complicating the setup process for some users.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    As an open-source project, it may not have the same level of stability or support as commercially supported software solutions.

Tesseract features and specs

  • Open Source
    Tesseract is free and open-source, allowing developers to use, modify, and distribute the code without any cost. This makes it accessible for individual projects and startup companies.
  • Multiple Language Support
    Tesseract supports a wide range of languages, including those with complex scripts. This makes it versatile for applications in different linguistic contexts.
  • Active Community
    The project has an active community and is well-maintained on GitHub, which means regular updates, bug fixes, and community support are available.
  • High Accuracy
    When properly configured and used with high-quality images, Tesseract can provide highly accurate OCR results.
  • Extensible
    Tesseract can be integrated with other tools and frameworks, such as image pre-processing libraries, to enhance its functionality and improve OCR results.

Possible disadvantages of Tesseract

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Tesseract can be complex for beginners. It may require additional dependencies and configuration to perform optimally.
  • Performance
    Tesseract is not the fastest OCR engine available. For applications requiring real-time processing, its performance may be a bottleneck.
  • Image Quality Dependency
    Tesseract's accuracy heavily depends on the quality of the input image. Low-quality images or those with significant noise can lead to poor OCR results.
  • Limited Handwriting Recognition
    Tesseract primarily excels at printed text recognition and offers limited capabilities for handwritten text.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Tesseract requires significant computational resources, which might be a limitation for mobile or low-power devices.

Analysis of Subtitle Editor

Overall verdict

  • Subtitle Editor is a highly competent tool for both amateurs and professionals looking for reliable subtitle editing features. Its ability to handle complex subtitle tasks with ease makes it a standout option in the field.

Why this product is good

  • Subtitle Editor, available at kitone.github.io, is frequently praised for its intuitive interface and robust features, making it a strong choice for users looking to create, edit, or translate subtitles with precision. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats and offers extensive options for customizing subtitles, ensuring compatibility with various media players. Furthermore, it's an open-source tool, which means it's regularly updated and improved by a community of developers.

Recommended for

    This tool is recommended for video editors, content creators, educators, and any individuals or organizations involved in multimedia production who require a flexible and efficient way to manage subtitles.

Analysis of Tesseract

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Tesseract is generally considered to be a good choice for OCR tasks due to its robustness, flexibility, and the fact that it is free and open-source.

Why this product is good

  • Tesseract is an open-source Optical Character Recognition (OCR) engine that is highly regarded for its accuracy, multilingual support, and active community. It can be used to extract text from images, which is useful in a variety of applications, such as digitizing documents, number plate recognition, and more. The project is continually being improved, with regular updates and a wide array of tools and libraries that integrate well with other software.

Recommended for

    Tesseract is recommended for developers and organizations looking for a reliable OCR engine to embed in their applications or workflows. It is suitable for projects that require text extraction from scanned documents, images, or PDFs and is especially beneficial for those who prefer open-source solutions.

Subtitle Editor videos

No Subtitle Editor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Tesseract videos

+ Add

Tesseract – Sonder | Album Review | Rocked

More videos:

  • Review - TesseracT - POLARIS Album Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Subtitle Editor and Tesseract)

Subtitle Editor

Tesseract

Audio Player
100 100%
Audio Player
0% 0
OCR
0 0%
OCR
100% 100
Music Player
100 100%
Music Player
0% 0
Image Recognition
0 0%
Image Recognition
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Subtitle Editor and Tesseract. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Subtitle Editor and Tesseract

Subtitle Editor Reviews

We have no reviews of Subtitle Editor yet.
Be the first one to post

Tesseract Reviews

7 Best OCR Software of 2022 (Free and PAID)
Tesseract is the best free OCR converter for various operating systems. It is free software released under the Apache License. Tesseract is considered one of the most accurate OCR engines currently available.
Source: theecmconsultant.com
The best alternatives to Abbyy FineReader
Top five alternatives to Abbyy FineReader PDF1. Klippa DocHorizonPros of Klippa DocHorizonConsKlippa DocHorizon is used in industries such asKlippa DocHorizon offers you data extraction for multiple file types such asPricing2. VeryfiPros of VeryfiConsVeryfi is used in industries such asVeryfi’s OCR software offers data extraction for multiple file types such asPricing3....
Source: www.klippa.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tesseract seems to be a lot more popular than Subtitle Editor. While we know about 79 links to Tesseract, we've tracked only 1 mention of Subtitle Editor. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Subtitle Editor mentions (1)

  • vim-srt-sync: one command away from fixing out-of-sync subtitle files
    I really don’t know about editing .srt files in vim. In the end, perhaps it is better to use specialized tools like https://kitone.github.io/subtitleeditor/ or something. Source: over 3 years ago

Tesseract mentions (79)

  • Mistral OCR
    Https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/seven_segments/ https://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~auerswal/ssocr/ https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract https://www.google.com/search?q=home+assistant+ocr+integration https://www.google.com/search?q=esphome+ocr+sensor https://hackaday.com/2021/02/07/an-esp-will-read-your-meter-for-you/ ...start digging around and you'll likely find something. HA has integrations which... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • OCR4all
    „OCR4all combines various open-source solutions to provide a fully automated workflow for automatic text recognition of historical printed (OCR) and handwritten (HTR) material.“ It seems to be based on OCR-D, which itself is based on - https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract - https://github.com/ocropus-archive/DUP-ocropy See - https://ocr-d.de/en/models. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • OCR Solutions Uncovered: How to Choose the Best for Different Use Cases
    Custom Integration: Developers and businesses needing flexibility for custom integration into applications and projects should consider open-source solutions like Tesseract OCR or API-based services like API4AI OCR. These options provide APIs for seamless integration into existing software systems. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Mastering Text Extraction from Multi-Page PDFs Using OCR API: A Step-by-Step Guide
    Tesseract OCR is an open-source OCR engine created by Google, known for its accuracy and wide language support. It is particularly favored by developers for its flexibility and the absence of licensing fees, allowing it to be integrated into various applications. However, it demands more effort to set up and utilize compared to cloud-based OCR services. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: How to OCR a PDF and preserve whitespace?
    Many of the OCR services are based on the free, open-source Tesseract OCR, but don’t expose all of the options. If you’re handy with shell scripts or Python, you can probably get better performance by hand-tuning options for your particular images. For example, if I recall there are page segmentation options to tell Tesseract to expect multi-column text. That alone might get you better performance than the... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Subtitle Editor and Tesseract, you can also consider the following products

Subtitle Edit - Free subtitle editor with visual sync, time adjustments etc.‎Subtitle Edit Online · ‎Subtitle Edit Videos · ‎Subtitle Edit 3.

ABBYY FineReader - ABBYY's latest PDF editor software, FineReader 16 you can easily convert files like PDF to Excel, PDF to Word, edit, share, collaborate & more with this PDF editor!

Aegisub - Aegisub is a free, cross-platform open source tool for creating and modifying subtitles. Aegisub makes it quick and easy to time subtitles to audio, and features many powerful tools for styling them, including a built-in real-time video preview.

GImageReader - gImageReader is a simple Gtk/Qt front-end to the Tesseract OCR Engine.

Subtitle Workshop - Subtitle Workshop, a free subtitle editor. Official website - download Subtitle Workshop and get Subtitle Workshop news and information.

Onlineocr.net - Free Online OCR service allows you to convert PDF document to MS Word file, scanned images to editable text formats and extract text from JPEG/TIFF/BMP files

Loading...