Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Storybook VS Animate.css

Compare Storybook VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

Storybook logo Storybook

Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.
  • Storybook Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Storybook features and specs

  • Component Isolation
    Storybook allows developers to isolate components from the main application, making it easier to develop and debug individual components without dealing with the app's entire context.
  • Live Component Demos
    Storybook provides real-time, interactive demos of components. This is especially useful for showcasing components to non-technical stakeholders or for internal documentation.
  • Improved Documentation
    Storybook's interface allows for comprehensive documentation of components, including their states and variations, which improves team communication and onboarding processes.
  • Supports Multiple Frameworks
    Storybook is framework-agnostic and supports popular JavaScript frameworks and libraries, including React, Vue, Angular, and more.
  • Addons and Plugins
    There is a large ecosystem of addons and plugins that extend Storybook's functionality, such as accessibility checking, design tool integration, and performance testing.
  • Hot Module Replacement (HMR)
    Storybook supports HMR, providing instant feedback on code changes without requiring a full page reload, thereby speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages of Storybook

  • Initial Setup and Configuration
    Setting up Storybook for the first time can be complex and time-consuming, especially for large projects with unique configurations.
  • Overhead for Small Projects
    For very small projects or simple components, using Storybook might add unnecessary overhead, both in terms of setup and ongoing maintenance.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a learning curve associated with Storybook, particularly for developers who are not familiar with component-driven development or have limited experience with UI libraries.
  • Performance Issues
    For extremely large projects, Storybook can sometimes experience performance issues, primarily due to the volume of components and stories being processed.
  • Dependency Management
    Storybook introduces additional dependencies to a project, which can complicate dependency management and version conflicts.
  • Context and Global State
    Managing global states, contexts, or inter-component interactions can be challenging in Storybook, as it isolates components from the larger application context.

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Storybook videos

Disney's Cinderella Deluxe Storybook Review

More videos:

  • Review - Disney's Snow White and The Seven Dwarfs Deluxe Storybook Review
  • Review - Disney Frozen The Story of Anna and Elsa Deluxe Storybook Review

Animate.css videos

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Storybook and Animate.css)
Developer Tools
76 76%
24% 24
Design Tools
62 62%
38% 38
React
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
66 66%
34% 34

User comments

Share your experience with using Storybook and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Storybook and Animate.css

Storybook Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Storybook is free, open-source, and one of the best JavaScript frameworks for creating separate UI elements and testing. For UI development, UI testing, and documentation, it is used by thousands of teams. It is simpler to find and repair issues with the components when developers use Storybook to construct a catalog and interact with them in a live environment.

Animate.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Animate.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Storybook seems to be a lot more popular than Animate.css. While we know about 225 links to Storybook, we've tracked only 1 mention of Animate.css. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Storybook mentions (225)

  • Monorepo Tutorial With Lerna, Storybook & Next.js
    In this tutorial, you'll learn how to build a monorepo using Lerna. We’ll be building a Next.js application which will import components from a separate package. We’ll also be using Storybook to showcase those components. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • UmiJS: the Shaolin of web frameworks
    Dumi. A static site generator specifically designed for component library development. Look at it as something between Storybook and Docusaurus inside the Umi world (but much better integrated between each other, presumably). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Screenshot testing: Gotta Catch 'Em All
    Import type { Meta, StoryObj } from '@storybook/react'; Import { fn } from '@storybook/test'; Import { Button } from './Button'; // More on how to set up stories at: https://storybook.js.org/docs/writing-stories#default-export Const meta = { title: 'Example/Button', component: Button, parameters: { // Optional parameter to center the component in the Canvas. More info:... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Storybook Starter Guide: Learn Design System Principles
    Storybook is an open-source tool for building and testing UI components in isolation. Think of it as a dedicated workshop where you can create, preview, and document components in every possible state without spinning up the full application. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Documenting Web Components With Storybook
    Documentation is a crucial part of any design system. There's the aspect of writing, maintaining, and ensuring that it doesn't drift from the codebase. It's a lot of work, and it's easy to let it slip. I've spent a lot of time over the last year and a half thinking about the right way to document components, and it took some time until I found a sustainable solution I was happy with. In this article, I want to... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Storybook and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products

styled-components - styled-components is a visual primitive for the component age that also helps the user to use the ES6 and CSS to style apps.

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library