Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Steel Bank Common Lisp VS newLisp

Compare Steel Bank Common Lisp VS newLisp and see what are their differences

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

newLisp logo newLisp

newLISP is a general purpose scripting language for developing web applications and programs in general in the domains of artificial intelligence (AI), statistics and machine learning.
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24
  • newLisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-26

Steel Bank Common Lisp features and specs

  • Performance
    Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is known for its high-performance execution due to its native code compiler, which optimizes and speeds up Lisp code execution significantly.
  • Standards Compliance
    SBCL is largely standard-compliant with Common Lisp, ensuring that code written for SBCL is portable across other Common Lisp implementations.
  • Actively Maintained
    The project is actively maintained and updated, which means it benefits from regular improvements, bug fixes, and up-to-date features.
  • Robust Debugging Tools
    SBCL offers robust debugging tools and a powerful REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop), which aid developers in interactive programming and troubleshooting.
  • Free and Open Source
    SBCL is open-source and available for free, which allows developers to use, modify, and distribute the software under the terms of the license.

Possible disadvantages of Steel Bank Common Lisp

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For beginners, especially those unfamiliar with Lisp or functional programming paradigms, learning SBCL can be challenging.
  • Platform Dependency
    While SBCL is available on multiple platforms, certain features and optimizations are specific to particular operating systems, which can affect portability.
  • Limited Built-in Libraries
    SBCL does not come with a broad range of built-in libraries compared to some other modern languages, which may require additional effort for library management.
  • Verbose Syntax
    Common Lisp, and by extension SBCL, is known for its verbose syntax, which can be cumbersome compared to newer, more concise programming languages.
  • Community Size
    The SBCL community, while active, is smaller compared to those of other mainstream programming languages, potentially limiting the availability of resources and community support.

newLisp features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

newLisp videos

Building newLISP 10.7.1 on Raspberry Pi

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Steel Bank Common Lisp and newLisp)
Programming Language
74 74%
26% 26
IDE
70 70%
30% 30
OOP
75 75%
25% 25
Text Editors
74 74%
26% 26

User comments

Share your experience with using Steel Bank Common Lisp and newLisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago

newLisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of newLisp yet. Tracking of newLisp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Steel Bank Common Lisp and newLisp, you can also consider the following products

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Allegro CL - Leading commercial Enterprise Development Tools and dynamic object-oriented Common Lisp development tools including Allegro CL with AllegroCache, an Object Database that provides Object Persistence in Lisp, native to the Lisp langauge.

Racket Lang - Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Guile - Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.