Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

stealjs VS WD.js

Compare stealjs VS WD.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

stealjs logo stealjs

Futuristic JavaScript dependency loader and builder. Speeds up application load times. Works with ES6, CommonJS, AMD, CSS, LESS and more. Simplifies modular workflows.

WD.js logo WD.js

WD.js is a Node.js Webdriver/Selenium 2 client that implements the JSONWire protocol and offers Q promises with chaining and Yiwed generators to avoid nested callbacks. It also has Mocha integration.
  • stealjs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-25
  • WD.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

stealjs features and specs

  • Modular Loader
    StealJS is a dynamic module loader that supports ES6, AMD, and CommonJS, offering flexibility in module formats and simplifying the development process.
  • Progressive Loading
    It supports progressive loading, which allows developers to load JavaScript dependencies only as needed, improving application performance and reducing initial load times.
  • Compatibility
    StealJS is compatible with various environments, including Node.js and web browsers, facilitating seamless development and deployment.
  • Plugin System
    Its extensible plugin system allows developers to customize the build process and integrate with other tools or libraries easily.
  • Live Reload
    StealJS provides live reload functionality, enabling developers to see changes instantly without manually refreshing the page, hence improving the development workflow.

Possible disadvantages of stealjs

  • Learning Curve
    Developers familiar with more traditional build tools might face a steep learning curve initially when adopting StealJS.
  • Community and Support
    StealJS has a smaller community compared to more popular bundlers like Webpack, which can result in less available support and resources.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Though powerful, its configuration can become complex for larger projects and may require additional effort to manage efficiently.
  • Performance Overhead
    Dynamic loading can introduce some runtime performance overhead compared to static bundling, potentially affecting execution speed.
  • Ecosystem
    While StealJS integrates with many tools, it may not have the same breadth of plugin ecosystem that some larger projects offer, potentially requiring manual integrations.

WD.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

stealjs videos

StealJS Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started With StealJS and ES6
  • Review - Easy ES6 with StealJS

WD.js videos

No WD.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to stealjs and WD.js)
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using stealjs and WD.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing stealjs and WD.js, you can also consider the following products

RequireJS - RequireJS is a JavaScript file and module loader.

webdriver-sync - Synchronous JavaScript wrapper around the Java Selenium Webdriver API that eliminated the need for callbacks or promises. Doesn't include any testing framework; you simply use the Selenium Java API.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

Leadfoot -> Intern - "Leadfoot is a JavaScript client library that brings cross-platform consistency to the Selenium WebDriver API.

JSPM - Front End Package Manager, Frontend Development, and Javascript

WebdriverIO - Webdriver module for Node.js. that makes it easier to write Selenium tests