Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JSPM VS WD.js

Compare JSPM VS WD.js and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JSPM logo JSPM

Front End Package Manager, Frontend Development, and Javascript

WD.js logo WD.js

WD.js is a Node.js Webdriver/Selenium 2 client that implements the JSONWire protocol and offers Q promises with chaining and Yiwed generators to avoid nested callbacks. It also has Mocha integration.
  • JSPM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-07
  • WD.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

JSPM features and specs

  • Modern JavaScript Support
    JSPM provides support for ES modules and modern JavaScript features, allowing developers to use the latest standards in their projects.
  • Dependency Management
    JSPM offers efficient dependency management by automatically resolving and managing package versions, which reduces conflicts and simplifies updates.
  • CDN Integration
    JSPM integrates with CDN services to enable direct module imports from URLs, reducing setup complexity and enhancing performance by leveraging distributed content delivery networks.
  • Ecosystem Compatibility
    JSPM is compatible with npm packages, allowing developers to access a wide range of libraries and tools available in the npm ecosystem.
  • Pluggable Build System
    JSPM includes a pluggable build system that can be customized and extended to suit different workflow requirements and optimizations.

Possible disadvantages of JSPM

  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to JSPM, there might be a steeper learning curve due to its unique features and configurations compared to more traditional package managers.
  • Limited Community Support
    JSPM may have a smaller community compared to established tools like Webpack or Parcel, potentially leading to fewer resources or community-driven plugins.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For small or simple projects, JSPM might introduce unnecessary complexity compared to lighter alternatives, which could be more straightforward for basic use cases.
  • Performance Overhead
    Depending on the project setup and usage, there might be some performance overhead during the initial setup or builds, particularly for very large projects.
  • Dependency on External Services
    Relying heavily on external CDNs and services can lead to potential issues if those services experience downtime or changes in policy.

WD.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

JSPM videos

+ Add

JSPM Engineering College Pune Honest Review | Cut-OFF | Placement | Fees | Campus | Student Reviews

More videos:

  • Review - JSPM PUNE | COLLEGE FEE| HOSTEL FEE | PLACEMENT | RANKING | CUT OFF | CAMPUS | JSPM COLLEGE REVIEW
  • Review - JSPM BSIOTR FE Computer students review

WD.js videos

No WD.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSPM and WD.js)

JSPM

WD.js

JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
Web Application Bundler
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JSPM and WD.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSPM seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSPM mentions (2)

  • Big Changes Ahead for Deno
    > We've been working on some updates that will allow Deno to easily import npm packages and make the vast majority of npm packages work in Deno within the next three months. This is really huge and will be a huge boost to the Deno ecosystem. On the other hand, I quite enjoyed that it wasn't jacked into NPM. There were reasonable alternatives like https://jspm.org/. This is a big swing at Node and I'll be watching... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • 5 More Things I Learned Building Snowpack to 20,000 Stars
    But I really want to make it clear that I'm so incredibly proud of this project and the people who have contributed to it. Snowpack meaningfully pushed the entire web development industry forward, and that's pretty cool. Even if you never use Snowpack directly, the work that we pioneered around npm package handling for ESM is already being built on and improved on across the entire web tooling landscape in... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

WD.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WD.js yet. Tracking of WD.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSPM and WD.js, you can also consider the following products

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

webdriver-sync - Synchronous JavaScript wrapper around the Java Selenium Webdriver API that eliminated the need for callbacks or promises. Doesn't include any testing framework; you simply use the Selenium Java API.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Leadfoot -> Intern - "Leadfoot is a JavaScript client library that brings cross-platform consistency to the Selenium WebDriver API.

RequireJS - RequireJS is a JavaScript file and module loader.

WebdriverIO - Webdriver module for Node.js. that makes it easier to write Selenium tests

Loading...