Static Site Boilerplate VS Create App

Static Site Boilerplate

A better workflow for building modern static websites.

Create App

Set up a new frontend project with webpack, Parcel or snowpack super quick.

Landing page //
2022-04-10

Landing page //
2023-05-16

Static Site Boilerplate

Website: staticsiteboilerplate.com
$ Details

Edit details

Create App

Website: createapp.dev
$ Details: -

Edit details

Static Site Boilerplate features and specs

Performance
Static Site Boilerplate is known for its fast loading times since it serves static files, which can be delivered quickly from a CDN.
Security
Static sites have fewer attack vectors compared to dynamic sites, reducing vulnerabilities like SQL injection and server-side attacks.
Scalability
Static Site Boilerplate inherently supports high scalability because static files can be easily replicated on multiple servers.
Simplicity
The framework is straightforward and simple to use, making it accessible to developers who want to create fast and efficient websites with minimal configuration.
No Server-Side Dependency
Since the output is purely static files, there's no need for any backend infrastructure or server management.

Possible disadvantages of Static Site Boilerplate

Limited Dynamic Functionality
Static Site Boilerplate is not ideal for websites that require server-side processing or real-time dynamic content as it does not support traditional backend server logic.
Content Management
Managing and updating content can be more cumbersome without a content management system (CMS) integrated into the workflow.
Build Time
With large sites, the build process can become time-consuming, as regenerating static files for every change takes time.
Initial Setup Complexity
For beginners, the initial setup and understanding of static site generation tools might seem complex compared to using a CMS.
Limited Interactivity
While possible to enhance with JavaScript, static sites inherently don't support highly interactive elements natively without additional scripting.

Create App features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Static Site Boilerplate videos

No Static Site Boilerplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Create App videos

+ Add

Vimeo Create App Review [UM... WTF?]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Static Site Boilerplate and Create App)

Create App

Developer Tools

77 77%

Developer Tools

23% 23

Design Tools

100 100%

Design Tools

0% 0

Tech

0 0%

Tech

100% 100

React

100 100%

React

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Static Site Boilerplate and Create App. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Create App seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Static Site Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Static Site Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Static Site Boilerplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Create App mentions (2)

Why should I use Next other than SSR?
I LOVE setting up projects from scratch with webpack and babel. It's confusing? yes, but there are tools that help you setup a basic config for instance, this one https://createapp.dev/ has been a life saver. It's not my product, it's just something I love. Source: almost 3 years ago
The ultimate Solana step-by-step guide (including programs, dapps and Rust from scratch)
I usually start by creating the webpack configuration myself with the Initial files. But I found a better way. Createapp.dev is the app (they didn't pay me to Say this, I just like it) I use now to generate the initial setup. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago