Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

StarTeam VS Apache Subversion

Compare StarTeam VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Zoho Projects
Turn every Project into a Success Story with Zoho Projects featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

StarTeam logo StarTeam

StarTeam is an all-in-one version control system that streamlines process-driven development.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • StarTeam Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

StarTeam features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    StarTeam provides a centralized platform for version control, enabling teams to collaborate efficiently and track changes across the entire software development lifecycle.
  • Comprehensive Change Management
    It offers robust change management capabilities, including issue tracking, requirements management, and task management, all integrated within the same system.
  • Customization and Scalability
    StarTeam is highly customizable, allowing organizations to tailor its functionalities according to their specific processes and scale as their needs grow.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It supports integration with various development tools and platforms, facilitating seamless workflows and reducing the need to switch between different software environments.
  • Security Features
    The platform offers strong security features, including access controls and audit trails, to ensure data integrity and compliance with industry standards.

Possible disadvantages of StarTeam

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and customization options can make StarTeam complex to set up and manage, requiring significant time and expertise to implement effectively.
  • Cost
    StarTeam can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations, considering licensing fees and the potential need for additional resources to manage and maintain the system.
  • Learning Curve
    Users might face a steep learning curve due to the wide array of functionalities, necessitating comprehensive training and documentation for effective usage.
  • Performance
    Some users report performance issues, particularly when handling large datasets or complex operations, which can hamper productivity.
  • Legacy System Integration
    While it integrates well with modern tools, connecting StarTeam with older systems can pose challenges, requiring additional effort and potentially third-party solutions.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

StarTeam videos

+ Add

Pulse Reviews with StarTeam

Apache Subversion videos

+ Add

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to StarTeam and Apache Subversion)

StarTeam

Apache Subversion

Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using StarTeam and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing StarTeam and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products

DSI Application Studio - DSI Application Studio is an ALM software that enables you to develop, deploy and manage your applications effectively.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Micro Focus ALM - Learn how Micro Focus’ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) software tools provide the agility, visibility, and collaboration solutions you need to optimize app development and testing, foster innovation, and improve the user experience.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

ImageSite - eQuorum’s ImageSite is an easy-to-use, single source document management system

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Loading...