Sorry, I've gone too far. I'm not here to persuade you to use Standard JS. My intention is to provide information and guidance on configuring JavaScript Standard Style for your team, should you agree with me or have other reasons to choose it. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

I picked up standard[1] a while back for this reason, I don't want to have to think about it. It works fine, I have no complaints (took me a while to get used to not using semi-colons but now I prefer it) Same reason I use `cargo fmt` as well. [1] https://standardjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

A Thin JavaScript Document Storage with Middleware Stack. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

For example, if you use https://standardjs.com/ - it will error on your second code snippet and if you ask it for an autofix - it will transfer the minus sign to the first line. Source: over 1 year ago

In comparison, JavaScript doesn't have a strict coding standard, although it does have widely accepted code style guides like the Airbnb JavaScript Style Guide and the JavaScript Standard Style. These guides provide recommendations for code formatting and naming conventions, but they are not as strictly enforced as the Java coding standard. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago