Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Stacker VS Thunder Client

Compare Stacker VS Thunder Client and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Stacker logo Stacker

No-Code internal tools powered by Airtable, GSheets + more

Thunder Client logo Thunder Client

Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative
  • Stacker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-28
  • Thunder Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Stacker features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Stacker provides a highly intuitive drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible for users with little to no technical expertise to create custom business applications.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It offers seamless integration with popular platforms like Airtable, Google Sheets, and Salesforce, allowing users to consolidate data from multiple sources into a single platform.
  • Customization Options
    Stacker allows for significant customization of workflows, views, and permissions, enabling businesses to tailor the platform to their specific needs.
  • Rapid Development
    Businesses can quickly develop and deploy applications, reducing the time to market for new solutions and improving overall efficiency.
  • Collaboration Features
    Enhanced collaboration tools allow team members to share and manage data easily, boosting productivity and ensuring everyone is on the same page.
  • Scalability
    The platform can scale with your business, supporting a growing number of users and increasingly complex data needs.

Possible disadvantages of Stacker

  • Cost
    Stacker can be relatively expensive for small businesses or startups, particularly if they require advanced features or larger user bases.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there can still be a learning curve for new users, especially when it comes to understanding all the customization options and optimal use cases.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond or not as helpful as needed, which can be a drawback if you encounter issues.
  • Limited Offline Access
    The platform relies heavily on internet connectivity, which can be a limitation for users who need offline access to their applications.
  • Feature Limitations
    While Stacker provides a wide range of features, it may not have all the advanced functionalities that some highly specialized industries require.

Thunder Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Thunder Client offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to create and manage API requests without getting overwhelmed by complex features.
  • VS Code Integration
    Being an extension for Visual Studio Code, it is convenient for developers who already use VS Code, enabling seamless API testing within their development environment.
  • Lightweight
    Compared to other API testing tools, Thunder Client is lightweight, making it ideal for users who need a quick and simple solution for testing APIs without extensive configuration.
  • Environment Variables
    The tool allows the use of environment variables, enabling users to manage different environments effectively and switch between them easily.
  • Support for Collections
    Supports organizing requests into collections, allowing for efficient management and categorization of related requests.

Possible disadvantages of Thunder Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Thunder Client lacks some of the advanced features found in more robust API testing tools, such as automation scripts and extensive plugin support.
  • Dependency on VS Code
    As a VS Code extension, it requires Visual Studio Code to run. This dependency can be a drawback for users who prefer other code editors or standalone applications.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Unlike some other API testing tools, Thunder Client does not have built-in collaboration features, which can limit its use in team environments.
  • Platform Specific
    It is primarily designed for use within Visual Studio Code, which may not be ideal for users who work across multiple platforms or require a standalone solution.

Analysis of Stacker

Overall verdict

  • Stacker is a good option for teams looking to leverage their existing data infrastructure to create functional applications without investing heavily in software development resources. It is particularly beneficial for companies looking to improve operational efficiencies quickly and cost-effectively.

Why this product is good

  • Stacker is a no-code platform that allows businesses and teams to build custom apps using their existing data sources like Google Sheets, Airtable, and others. It is praised for its user-friendly interface, enabling non-technical users to create applications without the need for traditional coding. It enhances productivity by streamlining workflows and is customizable to fit various business needs.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking to automate tasks.
  • Teams seeking to create custom applications without code.
  • Organizations already using data tools like Airtable or Google Sheets.
  • Non-technical users who want to build apps without developer help.

Analysis of Thunder Client

Overall verdict

  • Thunder Client is a good option for developers who want a minimalistic and efficient tool for testing APIs without the need for a standalone application. It is particularly beneficial for those who use Visual Studio Code as their primary development environment.

Why this product is good

  • Thunder Client is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight API testing solution. It is integrated directly into Visual Studio Code, allowing users to manage API requests without switching between applications. It supports RESTful services and offers features like collections, environment variables, and authentication support, comparable to other tools but within a more streamlined interface.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer working within Visual Studio Code
  • Those who need a simple and fast tool for testing REST APIs
  • Developers looking for an alternative to more complex API testing tools
  • Teams or individuals with straightforward API testing needs and require easy sharing of request collections

Stacker videos

No Stacker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Thunder Client videos

Thunder Client - API testing right inside VSCode

More videos:

  • Review - Do you really need Postman? | Use Thunder Client - VSCode extension | Easy & Lightweight
  • Review - Thunder client - Vscode extension | Say no to Postman

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Stacker and Thunder Client)
No Code
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
39 39%
61% 61
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Stacker and Thunder Client. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Stacker and Thunder Client

Stacker Reviews

The best no-code tools for sales teams
You can create an app in minutes. Thanks to Stacker’s handy template library, you can create your app in practically no time at all. Simply plug in your existing data sources and your app will be up and running in a few clicks. Of course, there’s also the option to build it from scratch.
Source: www.nocode.tech

Thunder Client Reviews

Best Postman Alternatives To Consider in 2025
This free, feature-rich extension integrates seamlessly with VSCode, making it ideal for developers who prefer a unified environment. Thunder Client offers collection management, environment variables, and basic automation capabilities. It stands out for its tight integration with VSCode's debugging tools.
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Thunder Client is a Vscode Postman alternative that runs as a Visual Studio Code extension (not open source). Its design focuses on simple and efficient HTTP clients while constructing or connecting with APIs. Thunder Client can handle a wide range of API requests. It effectively processes immense amounts of data simultaneously while not slowing down the VS Code program.
Source: testsigma.com
Top 5 Postman alternatives
Thunder Client is a VS Code extension focusing on being a simple and efficient HTTP client while building or integrating with APIs. It supports collections as a way to group relevant requests. Moreover, ThunderClient supports the concept of Environment and Environment Variables to store and re-use values within multiple requests. Finally, ThunderClinet offers a UI that you...
Source: testfully.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Stacker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Stacker mentions (7)

View more

Thunder Client mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Thunder Client yet. Tracking of Thunder Client recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Stacker and Thunder Client, you can also consider the following products

Retool - Build custom internal tools in minutes.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

ToolJet - Open-source alternative for Retool

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

NoCode.tech - Free tools & resources for non-tech makers and entrepreneurs

EchoAPI - Next-gen API development collaboration platform. More than just API design, debug, test, load-testing, and mock.