Stack Roboflow VS Stack Overflow Documentation

Sad, I had a lot of fun with it making StackRoboflow[1] (This Question Does Not Exist) a few years ago. The models (AWD-LSTM and GPT-2) weren't good enough back then to usefully answer programming questions -- but it's super cool to see that vision realized with GPT-4 and other modern LLMs. [1] https://stackroboflow.com. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

This feels like a Stack Roboflow question, however it's also what a lot of people on SO are actually like. "I don't want to read documentation and learn, I want a code answer!". Source: over 1 year ago

Https://stackoverflow.com/documentation : This product could have been the most useful data source for today's Codegen AIs. Alas, it didn't succeed. Source: about 1 year ago

That was compiled from the now shutdown Stack Overflow Documentation. Source: over 2 years ago

They're just reformatted reproductions of the Stack Overflow Documentation project which shut down August 8th, 2017. The information within is becoming more and more out of date. Goalkicker is a bit deceitful in the way they indicate the last update of thier material which doesn't apply to the content but only formatting. Goalkicker has never, to the best of my knowledge updated the content in any meaningful way. Source: over 2 years ago

They took a shot at the "encyclopedic and comprehensive" bit with Documentation which was ultimately a failure. Source: over 2 years ago

No, it was real documentation. It is a discontinued project by Stack Overflow. See more at the link I provided. Source: almost 3 years ago