Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

ST - Simple Terminal VS Spack

Compare ST - Simple Terminal VS Spack and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

ST - Simple Terminal logo ST - Simple Terminal

st is a simple terminal implementation for X.

Spack logo Spack

A flexible package manager supporting multiple versions, configurations, platforms, and compilers.
  • ST - Simple Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-28
  • Spack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-13

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ST - Simple Terminal and Spack)

ST - Simple Terminal

Spack

SSH
100 100%
SSH
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ST - Simple Terminal and Spack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ST - Simple Terminal and Spack

ST - Simple Terminal Reviews

The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The st or Simple Terminal emulator gives you precisely what you ask for. ” A simple terminal emulator to interact with your Linux distro.”
Source: www.fosslinux.com
Top 14 Terminal Emulators for Linux (With Extra Features or Amazing Looks)
Simple Terminal or popularly known as st is an alternative for users who dislike bloated terminal emulators like xterm or rxvt.
Source: itsfoss.com

Spack Reviews

We have no reviews of Spack yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ST - Simple Terminal seems to be a lot more popular than Spack. While we know about 44 links to ST - Simple Terminal, we've tracked only 1 mention of Spack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ST - Simple Terminal mentions (44)

  • Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."
    > you need to "edit your makefile". That isn't going to work for distributions Is it not? [st] requires exactly that. And distros seem to have no issues shipping it. [st] https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Write Your Own Terminal
    Check out st[1] for a minimal terminal implementation. They also have user-submitted patches that you can apply to add desired functionality. [1] https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Tabby: A terminal for a more modern age
    I am fundamentally and ideologically opposed to using a terminal emulator implemented in electron. If you feel similarly, then you might enjoy https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Warp? A terminal behind login popup
    My journey of using terminal emulators began together with my introduction to Linux about 7 years ago. GNOME terminal was my first as it came pre-installed on Ubuntu, my first Linux distribution. Since then, I've had the opportunity to explore and utilize a range of terminal emulators, including Alacritty, Kitty, st, Konsole, xterm, and most recently iTerm2. It's been interesting to experiment with these different... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • XTerm: It's Better Than You Thought (2021)
    For those looking for a minimal VT100 terminal emulator without the legacy baggage of Xterm, I highly recommend checking out Suckless Software’s st: https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Spack mentions (1)

  • Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."
    > Are we talking about the same autotools? Yes. Instead of figuring out how to do something particular with every single software package, I can do a --with-foo or --without-bar or --prefix=/opt/baz-1.2.3, and be fairly confident that it will work the way I want. Certainly with package managers or (FreeBSD) Ports a lot is taken care of behind the scenes, but the above would also help... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ST - Simple Terminal and Spack, you can also consider the following products

Kitty terminal - Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

Konsole - Konsole is a free terminal emulator which is part of KDE Software Compilation.

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.

NixOS - 25 Jun 2014 . All software components in NixOS are installed using the Nix package manager. Packages in Nix are defined using the nix language to create nix expressions.

Loading...