Based on our record, A Better Routeplanner seems to be a lot more popular than spritmonitor.de. While we know about 756 links to A Better Routeplanner, we've tracked only 5 mentions of spritmonitor.de. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The real world average numbers (e.g. spritmonitor.de) for a Tesla 3 are more like 18kWh/100km, more than what you claim. For comparison a modern gas powered Corolla will get on average 7L/100km (based on numbers from same site), or about 50kWh/100km, so Tesla is about 60%, not 80% more efficient. Source: over 1 year ago
That sounds like the minimum consumption, not the average. Average consumption for that car on spritmonitor.de seems to be around 7.8l/100km (about 30mpg). Source: over 1 year ago
That would allow me to drive about 318km in an ID4 when using the real world consumption reported by users on spritmonitor.de. Source: almost 2 years ago
However, I stopped using the MyPeugeot app very shortly after getting the car, it's not really that useful to me; fuel consumption is inaccurate, the app says that I average 4,22 L/100km over the last 38422 km, but I also track my fueling with spritmonitor.de and my true mileage is just 4,82 L/100km. The tracking of my trips could be somewhat useful, but I have google timeline enabled on my phone anyway so that's... Source: over 2 years ago
There is a popular fuel mileage tracking website in europe for this called spritmonitor.de Easy to select on make/model/year/fuel/engine etc. Source: almost 3 years ago
It's actually a 915km trip ending up in the French Alps during winter time, so it's more taxing on the battery, and I need some juice left on arrival (30%) You can test it out yourself on ABRP [0]. My trip goes from Lier, Belgium to Les Saisies, France. With "quickest arrival" setting, ABRP does 4 stops with a total charging time of 1h25min (and 8h29 driving). The stops are 28, 18, 18 and 22 minutes respectively.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=f10ce8fe-c1b7-4ade-9c5e-bc564189a799 22h of driving, of which 2h38m for rest&charging Seems totally reasonable to me. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
> With ICE I don't have to worry about any of that. You don't do that with EVs that nav takes all of that into account. The only valid issue are the poorly maintained Electrify America chargers on non Tesla EV's. But that about to change in the U.S. Since pretty much everyone is adopting NACS/SAE J340 Standard. Which will make them compatible with Tesla Superchargers. Apps like ABRP also exist that is compatible... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
There is a general drought of Tesla SCs in Queensland / NE Australia, so ABRP can't find a suitable route only using the SC network. Otherwise a scenario for the Lucid Air Dream Edition has it charging 6 times for a total of 4h12m (in "great" conditions, though): https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=c34a381b-83fc-4bd5-a6d9-2dd86fffc60c. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Anyhow, your trip is just shy of 300 miles and all freeway. ABRP says take a stop in Bradley for up to 40 minutes if I want to arrive with ~10% remaining. If you expect or see any traffic, including in the form of road construction, you'll get better than what ABRP predicts (it tends to run conservative). Charge time is 40 minutes total, so factor in a quick meal, bathroom stop & you're good to go. You might wish... Source: 5 months ago